The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2298 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand that you have done impact assessments; after all, you have to do them. What about economic assessments? Are they available?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I am sorry, but the scale of what Professor Miller is doing and the scale of what you are doing are different. I think that he is looking at 65 or 75 jobs; we do not know how many jobs you are looking at. However, you must accept that, to get to £90 million, it will be difficult—if not impossible—to rely solely on voluntary redundancies, if your first tranche has got you just 350.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I thank all of you for your time and your answers today. There are a number of points that you said that you would come back to us on. The only one whom I have not noted down is Professor Rigby, so you will be the only one with no further work to do as a result of this session. We will be keen to hear from the rest of you as quickly as possible on a number of the points that were raised.
I will continue with the committee’s own deliberations, which relate to a couple of Scottish statutory instruments, but you are all free to go. Thank you very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The next item on our agenda is consideration of four items of subordinate legislation, the first of which is being considered under the negative procedure. Do members have any comments to make?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
We move on to the second instrument, which is being considered under the negative procedure. When it considered the instrument at its meeting yesterday, the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee recommended some drafting changes.
Apart from that, if members have no comments, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations on this instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You are explaining that issues were raised by people lower down the pecking order and that you have stepped in and done this and that. Can you not see that, as someone at the top of an organisation that is going through such massive upheaval, you should bear ultimate responsibility?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That is contrary to much of what your lecturers, the trade unions and the senate are saying.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Everyone has got a different opinion, as I just mentioned: from the lecturers who have contacted us to the unions that have contacted us and the university senate, which voted that it had no confidence in you and the University of Edinburgh’s management.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes, but what I am saying is that, with regard to Dundee university, you said—ministers said—that they could not direct that money. I accept that this is slightly different, but in that case, money was going from the Government to the SFC, but you could not direct the SFC to spend it, because of ONS classification. In this case, you are putting money towards the SFC, and you are saying that you can direct it. I understand that there is a difference between the money going to universities and the money going to apprenticeships, but a theme that I have noticed is that ministers will often say, “We are not going to direct this or that body.” Should there be something in this legislation that specifically does direct the body in this respect, and should that money be ring fenced?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Before you do so, are you against or in favour of apprenticeship funding that goes to the Funding Council being ring fenced in the new apprenticeships budget? Would you be in favour of or averse to that?