The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2298 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Were you worried about what was in those draft papers, so you did not want them to go to the university executive group?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
If it happened once, you would not be happy, but it happened again and again. I am sorry, but I do not believe that you constantly asked for those papers. You accepted that they were never going to come to your group. Why did they not come? Just be honest and tell us.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That is probably the furthest that you have gone in more than two and a half hours of evidence. I wonder why it has taken us that long to get that amount of contrition from you.
The reason that I made that particular point about how often that phrase is repeated in the report is because, throughout your evidence today, you have tried to blame the information that you were provided with. You have said that you were not given the proper facts and figures to see those issues occurring on the horizon, to stop them from happening or to deal with them promptly.
However, Gillies says, a dozen times, that you could have been, should have been or were aware. How do you respond to that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Pamela Gillies says that in the light of all the evidence that was provided, and in the light of seeing what you were provided with by finance teams, by interim and full finance directors, by your chief operating officer and by your deputy vice chancellor.
Pamela Gillies knew all the information that you were provided with, and she still says, a dozen times, that you, as the principal, should have, could have and would have been aware of those things, but you are telling us today that, on many of those occasions, you were not.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The auditors certainly understood, because it took them days to reject what you said.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You were not there to do that. The financial statement had already been written and printed off, and you were scribbling all over it to make it seem more positive and to make it look as though you were running a university that was profitable and doing well, when you were not.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
It is good to get on the record the fact that you relied mainly on them, because, overnight, we were provided with information from a current member of the court. They apologised for getting the document to us so late, but it had just come into their hands.
The document contains your handwritten amendments to the financial statements of 2023-24—I have them here in front of me. That makes me query why you were getting so involved. Why were you making handwritten amendments to the financial statements, given that you have just told us, seconds ago, that you relied so heavily on the finance director and the team around the finance director?
I will elaborate. There is a sentence in the statement that says that there was an
“overall adverse impact resulting in an operational deficit”.
That is what was written but, in your handwritten note, you wanted that changed to say that there was a “small operational deficit”.
Another element says that the university’s 2024 financial performance was “adverse to budget”. Your handwritten note wanted that changed to say that the university’s financial performance was
“comparatively strong compared to much of the sector”,
in what had been a turbulent year, but, nonetheless, it was adverse to the budget.
You do not have training and you rely heavily on your finance team, but you wanted to paint a brighter picture by changing the statement. The auditor rejected it—your handwritten amendments did not pass muster.
Why were you trying to do that? To go back to what Pamela Gillies said about your character, you always tried to present too bright a picture.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes. Did you write handwritten notes on much of the financial—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You did, because they did not appear.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That is not the view from this side, anyway. You have—