The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3160 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Sorry, but the provision is in the bill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Sorry, but why not? What was the time constraint?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
With regard to some of those points from John Mason, we had a very critical letter from the Finance and Public Administration Committee, which has looked into the issue and noted that some of the submissions suggested that the financial memorandum includes
“inaccurate assumptions in some areas”
and that it
“uprated inflation costs from 2011-12.”
It went on to say:
“The respondents noted that simply adjusting for inflation costs from more than 10 years ago is not sufficient to ‘reflect the current demand and the need that social work, education and community supports experience’.”
Is there no better way than looking at figures from more than a decade ago?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Would you not have had that by now, had COSLA not also said to the finance committee that it was
“not engaged on the content of the financial memorandum ... despite being clear that Local Government was ready and willing to engage”?
That is a direct quote from COSLA to the Finance and Public Administration Committee. If COSLA was ready and willing to engage, why were you not?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Minister, did it raise alarm bells for you?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
How many consultation responses have there been? If it is 10, it will not take long, but if it is 1,000, it will.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Will your thinking now move there?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
This week, I have been discussing with others with whom I have had meetings the fact that the University of Greenwich and the University of Kent have come together—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
That is an arrangement whereby the universities keep their own identities but share services. Is that the type of thing that could be considered?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
That is quite revealing. The impression that I was given by the cabinet secretary is that she is all over this, but if she has not spoken to you since August and you have not had any discussions with the new minister, that is concerning.
I will finish my point before I go back to Mr Rennie. If you believe that the Government accepts that the number of job losses at Dundee university will be above 300, how far above 300 will it be? What is the threshold at which the Government will say no?