The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2298 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You have not said one way or the other whether you think you deserved the £150,000-plus pay-off. Given everything that has gone on, everything that you have, I hope, read—even though you did not watch our evidence yesterday—and everything that you have heard from your former colleagues and from students who trusted you to lead their university, have you, at any point, considered paying that money back?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
At any point, did you consider that, having created this mess, you did not deserve that money so would pay it back?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
But you do not regret them enough to pay back £150,000.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
How can that be the case when you were the accountable officer? Were people not telling you the truth? Were they withholding information from you? Were you not in the country or at the university enough to hear those concerns?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Hold on, Professor Gillespie. First of all, if you had watched yesterday’s evidence session, you would have been very clear that the finance director was totally out of his depth in this area. He did not feel that he had the required expertise to deal with the covenant. From listening to him yesterday, I accepted that he would not be passing on advice on the issue, because he was seeking advice himself. I am not sure how you can put all that on him.
You were the accountable officer. You were in charge. You were the principal. By the sound of things, you were not that worried about the situation. You travelled down to London and had an ad hoc conversation about it. There had been a major breach of the finances in your university. You held a very senior position at that time, not just in your university but for universities across Scotland. Are you telling us that you did not inform your own court—which is in charge of governance—about the issue?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You found out about the situation in late September or early October. Why did it take until mid-November to contact the Funding Council to alert it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I think that we now have enough context from your very full answers, so if we could just get to the point for the rest of them, please.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay. Carry on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
It was in September or October.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Rennie’s first question was on whether there were any complaints about your behaviour. You now seem to know an awful lot about that case—