The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2298 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much.
We have been here for more than four hours both this morning and into the afternoon, and I appreciate the time that you have given us. However, I will finish with the question that I started with, because, after four hours, I am no clearer about it. Why did this happen? A lot of explanation has been given, but I am concerned with the why. Is it just the simple fact that we had all the wrong people in all the wrong senior positions of responsibility who all failed to pick up on the deficiencies of the others? Is there any other conclusion that can be reached?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes—it was a massive statement that you were issuing to the Funding Council, and you think that it was appropriate to drop them a three-line email. Maybe it was your view that the matter was not that serious—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Sorry—hold on. Staff were clearly going to be under threat as a result of the situation. Students were going to be worried. Tens of millions of pounds were going to have to be saved somehow, and someone with decades of experience at the university, who told us at the very beginning of the meeting how proud he was of that institution, tells the Funding Council, “I’m just dropping you a line to say that the university I have been part of for so long is in such financial crisis that we’re looking at saving £25 million to £30 million.â€
I think that that shows a complete lack of any concern about or understanding of the gravity of what you were about to impart to that university community, which has led to the situation today. Do you not accept that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you think that that comes across in your email?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Dr McGeorge, did you at any point communicate to any vice-principals that they could not attend any committee meetings?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
So, there will not be any evidence to substantiate the claim that I have received that you personally advised vice-principals not to attend.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Nothing at all.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
There is a difference between acknowledging and accepting. Do you accept that your court failed in its governance responsibilities in June 2024?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You did.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You did, because you said that, if you felt that questions were not relevant and they were operational, you would not allow them. You have literally just said that.