The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
You must have seen the 13 requests for redactions that went far beyond those that were simply about naming a member of staff.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
So, the union can demand redactions from you and you will submit those as the SQA. You signed off as
“Interim Director of Qualifications Development
Donna Stewart”.
You do not say that you are writing on behalf of the union. Whatever the union had said to you, even if they had given you 130 redactions, would you have put them all to Kirsty MacDonald?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
I am not seeing any of that clarity. The comments that I am reading out do not mention an individual member of staff. They do not relate to someone who can be identified; they relate to the SQA—the organisation that you all work for. They do not relate to individual members. It therefore seems to be the case that it is the SQA that does not want those comments in the public domain, rather than the union that is operating on behalf of one member of staff.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Well, does it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
I was contacted by a faculty head who has tried to use that. Will you respond to his concerns, which I will quote? He said:
“History teachers from my school and others I know have emailed the dedicated email address with little resolution to their queries.”
He continued:
“Responses to date have said that the specific question can’t be answered”
and that, instead,
“text which feels like an automated response with links to “Understanding Standards” and course reports”
is sent on, although they have already seen and read those things.
He then communicated with the escalated email address. The SQA responded after two weeks and apologised for the delay—the response should have come within five days—but all the SQA sent was three bullet points and another hyperlink. In the teacher’s response to that, he said:
“If this is an escalated response, I dread to think what others are receiving. It’s clear to see the email address service is nothing more than a publicity stunt, and the SQA have no interest in providing help to teachers across the country, who are on their knees and crying out for help.”
What is your response to a faculty head who is raising those concerns about the measures that you have put in place to deal with exactly the problems that he and his team are experiencing?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Ms Stewart, in response to Pam Duncan-Glancy, you mentioned the history helpline. That includes the email address that was set up for teachers to be able to contact the SQA for advice. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Did you recognise the criticisms of the “Understanding standards” events that we heard from the SATH representatives?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Having sat in on one event, did you deem it to be any different from, or worse or poorer than others? Is the 60 per cent rating that you mentioned standard, or would you normally get a higher positive percentage?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Can you confirm that the SQA was involved in a report by SATH not being published back in 2020?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
You did not want two similar surveys to be published at the same time.