łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 23 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1956 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

You must have seen the 13 requests for redactions that went far beyond those that were simply about naming a member of staff.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

So, the union can demand redactions from you and you will submit those as the SQA. You signed off as

“Interim Director of Qualifications Development

Donna Stewart”.

You do not say that you are writing on behalf of the union. Whatever the union had said to you, even if they had given you 130 redactions, would you have put them all to Kirsty MacDonald?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

I am not seeing any of that clarity. The comments that I am reading out do not mention an individual member of staff. They do not relate to someone who can be identified; they relate to the SQA—the organisation that you all work for. They do not relate to individual members. It therefore seems to be the case that it is the SQA that does not want those comments in the public domain, rather than the union that is operating on behalf of one member of staff.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Well, does it?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

I was contacted by a faculty head who has tried to use that. Will you respond to his concerns, which I will quote? He said:

“History teachers from my school and others I know have emailed the dedicated email address with little resolution to their queries.”

He continued:

“Responses to date have said that the specific question can’t be answered”

and that, instead,

“text which feels like an automated response with links to “Understanding Standards” and course reports”

is sent on, although they have already seen and read those things.

He then communicated with the escalated email address. The SQA responded after two weeks and apologised for the delay—the response should have come within five days—but all the SQA sent was three bullet points and another hyperlink. In the teacher’s response to that, he said:

“If this is an escalated response, I dread to think what others are receiving. It’s clear to see the email address service is nothing more than a publicity stunt, and the SQA have no interest in providing help to teachers across the country, who are on their knees and crying out for help.”

What is your response to a faculty head who is raising those concerns about the measures that you have put in place to deal with exactly the problems that he and his team are experiencing?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Ms Stewart, in response to Pam Duncan-Glancy, you mentioned the history helpline. That includes the email address that was set up for teachers to be able to contact the SQA for advice. Is that correct?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Did you recognise the criticisms of the “Understanding standards” events that we heard from the SATH representatives?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Having sat in on one event, did you deem it to be any different from, or worse or poorer than others? Is the 60 per cent rating that you mentioned standard, or would you normally get a higher positive percentage?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Can you confirm that the SQA was involved in a report by SATH not being published back in 2020?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

You did not want two similar surveys to be published at the same time.