The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2298 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
So, you travelled business class to all those destinations.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Why were those papers produced in draft but not provided to the membership of that group?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
This is extraordinary. You just said that you first knew that £40 million had been blown and was no longer ring fenced on the day of the meeting in which you told the court about the £35 million to £40 million shortfall. That morning, you woke up thinking that you would go to court and tell them everything was fine. Between waking up and going to court, you found out that you had lost £40 million. Is that your evidence? That is not credible.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Having read the entire report and everything that has been written about this, and having listened to staff, students and whistleblowers who have revealed some of the graphic details of what went on, I am led to only two final conclusions: you were either incompetent or corrupt. Which was it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I am grateful for your time today. I understand that this will not have been easy. I hope that, in some ways, you have been able to put your side of the argument. It is for others to judge the merits or otherwise of what you have told us and what other witnesses have told us. The matter certainly had to be thoroughly investigated and interrogated. You have been part of that by making yourself available today. For that, I thank you.
I thank members for their patience this week, which has been very busy for the committee, especially given the education matters that have been discussed in the chamber.
Meeting closed at 11:30.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You were clearly trying to make the financial statements look better than they were and you were found out days later by the auditors. I will move on to questions from Maggie Chapman.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
How could the same person who got her forensic analysis of the financial situation correct get her forensic analysis of your leadership style—in your view—wrong?
Pamela Gillies said that you
“tended to control the narrative to Court and elsewhere, consistently painting a picture that all was well in the University”,
that you
“frequently demonstrated hubris ... dangerous over self-confidence and complacency, often in combination with arrogance”,
and that you had an
“overbearing leadership style, behaviours and dislike of potentially awkward confrontations and questioning.”
It was not just one remark; she rips apart your character.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Professor Gillespie, the evidence was submitted in order to allow us to question witnesses, including you. Are you saying that you did not prepare for this session by looking at the evidence that has been submitted by others?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
How could she get that so wrong? And she is not the only one. Did you watch our evidence session yesterday?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I find it somewhat ironic that someone who went on 11 foreign trips in two years should criticise other people for not being at the university. However, from your answers to Joe FitzPatrick, I do not quite understand why you then asked your company secretary and chief operating officer to negotiate without prejudice a package for Wendy Alexander to leave.