The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1437 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
I thank both our witnesses for your attendance at the committee this morning. I close the public part of today鈥檚 proceedings.
11:14 Meeting continued in private until 11:17.Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
Our previous panel represented Alcohol Focus Scotland, the Food and Drink Federation and Scottish Environment LINK. One of the concerns that they raised in their submissions involved dispute resolution. In the context of the frameworks, is it clear to businesses how dispute resolution will take place in the future, and is it clear where the challenges are likely to be? Will they be against the common frameworks or against the legislation itself? Are you able to comment on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
My apologies, Mr Clancy鈥攜ou wanted to come in on a previous question that Mr Cameron asked. Do you want to do that now, please?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
Mr Cameron has some more questions, so maybe it has not.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
There is a Government relationship there, but there is also the relationship of the Parliaments. I may have picked this up wrong, but I thought you said that the parliamentary partnership assembly structure had been confirmed in the UK. Is it still possible that the PPA delegates could include people from the devolved legislatures?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
I thank everyone for observing our remembrance day two-minute silence.
We return to Mr Clancy.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
My final question is a bit hypothetical, although much of what we have talked about has been hypothetical. In an ideal world, the frameworks will work perfectly and there will never be a need for the Westminster Government to exercise executive power. My understanding is that, under the Scotland Act 1998, committees of the Scottish Parliament are empowered to scrutinise the Scottish Government, but how can such scrutiny take place if an executive power is used in a devolved area at Westminster? How would the Parliament and its committees consider that? Might it mean a change to the devolution guidance notes?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
Thank you. I will bring in Ms Sargeant to comment on those points.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
Good morning, and welcome to the ninth meeting of the Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee. We have received apologies from Maurice Golden MSP and Mark Ruskell MSP.
At 11 am today, we will pause for a short act of remembrance, which will take place throughout the Scottish Parliament. At that time, we will observe a two-minute silence.
Our first agenda item is an evidence-taking session for our inquiry into the United Kingdom internal market. The aim of the inquiry is to consider the UK internal market鈥檚 implications for Scotland, including how devolution will work, going forward.
In our first panel of witnesses on the topic, we will hear from: Alison Douglas, who is the chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland; David Thomson, who is the chief executive of the Food and Drink Federation Scotland; and Vhairi Tollan, who is the advocacy manager for Scottish Environment LINK. I welcome you all and thank you for your submissions.
I remind committee members that, if they wish to direct a question to a particular member of the panel, they should say so at the start of the question. We are constrained by time, so I ask witnesses and my fellow committee members to be succinct, where possible.
All the submissions highlight the risks of the UK internal market and the risk that Governments might be more hesitant to consider innovative policies for tackling particular issues鈥攁 deposit return scheme, for example鈥攊n order to avoid competitive disadvantage to Scottish businesses. The risk is that there might be lower regulatory standards in order to retain a competitive internal market in the UK. How could we prevent that from happening?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Clare Adamson
I am afraid that we are not yet finished. I have a few final questions.
The committee has a specific role to play on this matter, but other subject committees of the Parliament will be able to scrutinise certain areas, too. Going back to our discussion on the interparliamentary forum on Brexit, I should say that we have dropped the reference to Brexit from its title, and I also point out that it will be meeting on 10 December. That was an informal arrangement by different legislatures that came about so that they could work together. Does there need to be a more formal position for such for a at the moment? Does guidance on transparency and scrutiny, certainly for select committees across different areas, needs to be more formalised?