The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1189 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
In answer to Mr Mason, you implied that the demand for public inquiries was growing. Is one of the reasons for that increase the fact that public services in the UK, not just in Scotland, are not delivering satisfactory answers when something goes wrong?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Indeed鈥擨 really think that that is quite a serious issue, and it is one of the reasons for the increasing demand for specific public inquiries. Actually, I think that it is also a reason why inquiries are taking longer鈥攖he to-ing and fro-ing that is needed to get the information required takes an awfully long time, and the costs multiply. It is partly the hidden costs that result in the process taking such a long time; redaction, for example, is vital for data confidentiality and so on.
However, there is a real issue with the amount of time that the process itself takes. There is frustration with that, because some of the answers should have been provided before by some of the agencies that have been accused of a lack of accountability and of not taking responsibility. That is a major issue. Do you have any thoughts about what we can do to improve that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I have just a very short question. Do you think that the Parliament needs to look at the Inquiries Act 2005?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
How does the advisory group on tax strategy input into that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I understand that. That is interesting because, if the group is providing advice about behavioural changes, surely that is extremely important for any decision that the Government comes to in relation to a strategy that will provide you with extra revenue and enable you to control public finances. How easy is it for you, as the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, to be able to take on board the facts that the Fiscal Commission has given you and also the advice鈥攁nd it is advice鈥攖hat your tax group is providing? That advice includes behavioural change. The Fiscal Commission says that behaviour is crucial for the amount of revenue that you are likely to bring in, not just now but in years hence.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I understand that; they probably could not be reconciled at all. Nevertheless, you have to make a decision, in setting your policy, as to which views you consider most important, and that has to correlate鈥擨 would hope鈥攚ith the information that the Scottish Fiscal Commission and the other economic forecasters have provided. It is on that aspect that there are some issues to do with a lack of transparency.
I know that it would be for the Parliament to decide on this, but does the Scottish Government have a view on the possibility of introducing a finance bill in this parliamentary session? Such a bill could be important as it would not only put the Government鈥檚 tax-and-spend priorities on a legal basis but enable the Parliament to scrutinise that in the usual way during the passage of the bill. Is the Government open to doing that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
You have heard the criticism that has been levied that different committees of the Parliament鈥攚ith the notable exception of this one鈥攖end not to scrutinise the budget in huge detail because of all the other work that they are doing. Consequently, as the convener said at the outset, there is sometimes difficulty in understanding where various budget lines are, particularly budget line 4鈥攊n other words, where the money is. However, if we had a finance bill, the Parliament would scrutinise the different stages in considerable detail, which might help with some of the issues to do with the lack of transparency.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
My personal view, which is not just a result of the inquiry that I have been involved with but from reading extensively about other inquiries, is that victims do not feel that there is sufficient accountability in public authorities. In other words, the reason for the demand for public inquiries is that people are dissatisfied with the lack of accountability of different public bodies. If that is the case, that is a major issue. Therefore, in order to ensure better accountability, should there be more Government input into ensuring that whistleblowing is effectively responded to, or should there be other structures in the Government that can hold bodies to account?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
My last question is a general one鈥擨 am not talking about any specific inquiry. Do you think that there has been an increasing temptation for the Government鈥攁ny Government, not just those of a particular political colour鈥攖o accept a public inquiry because doing so gets it out of the responsibility of taking decisions that perhaps it should have been taking?