The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1222 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liz Smith
There will definitely have to be a new financial memorandum. I reiterate that four committees of Parliament are not happy with the current plan, which is why I asked the question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liz Smith
Notwithstanding that, is it not the case that the overall tax revenues are nothing like what we need to be able to take in to address some of the funding gap? That is the problem, and today鈥檚 statistics about unemployment, employment and economic inactivity were pretty stark about the numbers of people who are not actually in work at all, which means a loss of potential revenue. Then we have the issue with north-east jobs, which are some of the better-paid ones with people paying slightly higher tax rates. That money is not coming to the Scottish Government, so there is a pretty serious situation where the tax revenue that the Scottish Government is getting just now is nothing like what is required to deliver extra money for its public expenditure.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liz Smith
One final question, cabinet secretary: what would you do to make Scotland more competitive in terms of tax in comparison with the rest of the UK?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liz Smith
The committee is interested in the issue on two fronts. First, as you know, we have issues with the initial financial memorandum to the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill, the lower estimate for the cost of which was 拢1.3 billion, which is a considerable amount of money in relation to some of the things that we are discussing.
Given that so many stakeholders gave evidence in committee that showed that the particular national care service programme that the Scottish Government has put forward is not desperately popular鈥攚e have four committee reports that demonstrate that鈥攚ill the Scottish Government consider realigning some of that money to help with other expenditure? I am asking for confirmation that that will be reviewed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liz Smith
Thank you for that. I will come to the point about widening the tax base in a moment, but I want to go back to the issue of projected increases in health, social care and social security spending. You said that you are looking at 500 different programmes to see where potential savings might be made. Does that include the national care service?
10:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liz Smith
Secondly, I turn to the tax issue. You have made no apology for a progressive tax agenda, but is it not the case, cabinet secretary, that the current structures are not yielding the increase in revenues that we need? In the 2020-21 budget, the revenues were only 拢96 million more than the amount that was subtracted from the block grant鈥攖hat figure came from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, and the Scottish Government came out with the same statistic. What do you propose to do to ensure that the tax base is not only wider than it is now but also that the revenues that we get from tax overall increase? That is a major part of the equation that you described in your opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Liz Smith
Good morning. My questioning will focus on two areas. The first is about the frustration that I think we all feel about the different timings of the various forecasts that underpin strategies鈥攚hether it be those for the medium-term financial strategy or any other set of forecasts鈥攁nd how the OBR and the SFC forecasts relate to the different timings in the budget cycle. That has an impact on the projections that can be made, given the data at that time. Is there scope to bring the timings of the forecasts slightly closer together so as to make things easier? I am sure that the OBR and the SFC would welcome that as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Liz Smith
On the discussions about the forthcoming new fiscal framework, which will replace the 2016 version, are you aware of any dialogue about the forecasting element?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Liz Smith
Just to finish off on that point, at your breakfast in the Parliament event some weeks ago, we focused on the potential high-growth areas of financial services, renewables, digital industries and technology. Are there other areas of the workforce where we have a chance of better, higher-paid jobs that will widen that tax base?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Liz Smith
You said something very interesting about some people in the workforce taking a territorial approach. The same is also true of patients and families, who get very attached to their local hospital or medical service; indeed, we have seen what can happen when there is any hint that a hospital will be closed or that certain parts of it will be shut. However, you are correct to say that, for the benefit of medical services in the future, that is exactly what will have to happen to make the system more efficient. Given the nature of the reform that is needed, do you have any suggestions for what we should do to bring the public with us? I think that that will be a very difficult challenge.