³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1222 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

I heard your answer to Mr Mason—I was just asking why you had made that decision.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

Right.

Sticking with the education and skills portfolio, am I correct in thinking that some pupil equity money has been returned to the centre?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

My final question is on the First Minister’s statement about the £300 million extra that is being allocated to the national health service. As I understand it, we are talking about £100 million in each successive budget over three years. Are you able to say where that money is coming from?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

With respect, minister, it is not enough just to put it out in good faith. As Michelle Thomson rightly said, it is our duty and responsibility in this committee to be rigorous in the scrutiny that we adopt on the financial memorandum. She also cited the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill and the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill. I understand why it is important that good policy making is based on co-design, where the stakeholders work in collaboration with the Government. I absolutely get that, but, if that co-design process is extended almost indefinitely—as it is, as far as I can see, in this case—it is almost impossible for us to scrutinise the final numbers of a financial memorandum. Do you accept that?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

I am asking the question because, although Mr Quayle answered the question about some detail of the possible timescales, there is a big question about the on-going co-design of the policies. It is clear from the evidence that we have taken so far that local authorities are not at all confident that the extent of the co-design is either certain or, in terms of the timescales, very clear. I will ask again: why do you have 10 out of 10 confidence in the financial memorandum?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

If you are making the point that your confidence in the financial memorandum is 10 out of 10, why is it that the witnesses from whom we have taken evidence say that theirs is at four or five? Why is there that discrepancy? What has gone wrong there?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

I will follow on from Michelle Thomson’s line of questioning, which is important. Standing orders say that a financial memorandum must set out the

“best estimates of the costs, savings, and changes to revenues to which the provisions of the Bill would give rise, and an indication of the margins of uncertainty in such estimates. The Financial Memorandum must also include best estimates of the timescales over which such costs, savings, and changes to revenues would be expected to arise.â€

You have put it on record this morning that you think that this financial memorandum is 10 out of 10 when it comes to confidence. In relation to the timescales that you are setting out, are you absolutely confident that that is correct?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

If teachers and non-teaching staff have had that uplift, what are the implications for the next budget with regard to those pay settlements?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

All of it?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Liz Smith

The logic of what you are saying is that, if you have 10 out of 10 confidence in this, you feel that that degree of certainty and clarity is there. We have witnesses who say that that is not the case. I am asking why you think there is this discrepancy in the degree of confidence in the financial memorandum. That is a serious concern for the committee, because it is our job to scrutinise that. I ask you again: why do you think there is that discrepancy?