˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1189 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

That is very helpful, thank you.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

My second question relates to some of the evidence that we have taken prior to today: namely, that there is concern that the growing demand for public inquiries—with some exceptions; not in relation to Covid, for example—is coming about because there is a perceived failure of Government agencies to address specific problems. Therefore, it is convenient for a Government to push the issue aside and say, “The inquiry will look after that,” when, in fact, there is a role for Government, which should be sorting the delivery of our public services a bit better. Do you agree with that?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Care Reform (Scotland) Bill: Financial Summary

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

And secondary legislation, too?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Care Reform (Scotland) Bill: Financial Summary

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

My point is that the principle is one thing, but the workability and the delivery of whatever is going to take place are a different issue. As I understand it, having read the Official Reports of the various committees that were involved at the time, the principle was generally pretty well accepted, but how workable the Government’s proposals were was a completely different issue. That is where the opposition came from.

We started with one bill, which no longer exists, and we now have a second attempt at a bill that is based on what is seen to be more acceptable. Why are you confident that, when it comes to stage 2 amendments and possible stage 3 amendments, the on-going co-design will make the new bill much more acceptable to people?

09:45  

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

That was generally accepted to be a perfectly acceptable endeavour.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

Based on the very interesting comments that you have just made, Dr Ireton, do you feel that there is a case for judge-led inquiries, to ensure that there is public trust?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

If evidence that has not been foreseen comes to an inquiry, is it appropriate to change, extend or modify the terms of reference, to allow that evidence to become a critical part of the inquiry?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

Just to be absolutely clear, am I correct in thinking that, if evidence is forthcoming that was not foreseen at the start of the inquiry, it is for the chair to go back to the Scottish Government for any amendment or adjustment to the terms of reference?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

That is why I am asking the question—I was aware of that. In the Inquiries Act 2005, it is clear that there is limited scope for such evidence. As I understand it, not even recommendations can be made to other jurisdictions. Nonetheless, some evidence from foreign jurisdictions might be relevant to a public inquiry. It is just a question of what process can be used to open that up.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Liz Smith

The costs that go alongside that extra work are something that we would find very difficult to control, I presume.