The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1221 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
Both, actually. You said at that breakfast seminar that there is a bit of a trade-off whereby we have to measure up what the Scottish Government should prioritise. That was one of the best events that you have run in the Parliament, because it gave us a wider perspective on what the challenges are, and the reason why it was good is that we got additional data. The charge on this Parliament is to measure how effectively we are spending public money. I just wonder whether there are extra bits of information that we could have.
10:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
Would it help the pursuit of getting the right evidence? It would increase the scrutiny.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
Paragraph 1.2 of the OECD report is titled “The SFC has strengthened relationships with key stakeholders”, and you mentioned some of those stakeholders. Why do you think that your relationships have improved? Is it because your personal contacts are very strong, or is it because you have a greater understanding of those stakeholders and more data on what they are doing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
Those are policy choices—they are not for you but for politicians. We cannot make effective, evidence-based decisions about public spending priorities until we know what the good-quality data is and what the effects of decisions are. That is basically what we are after. It has been a past concern of the Auditor General, as well as yourself, that we need to do more on that basis.
We have discussed twice before the possibility of having a finance bill, which I think could help us, but you are not going to answer that question. However, do you feel that a fiscal framework between central Government and local government could help that process?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
Local authorities often tell us that they have been on single-year budgets—it is a bit hand to mouth—so they are having to make very quick decisions and are not necessarily looking to the medium term. One of the reasons—this is a personal view—that I feel that a fiscal framework arrangement could help that process is that it could improve the transparency and the expectation of what evidence could be provided before decisions are made.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Liz Smith
Good morning, permanent secretary. Following on from your previous appearance, I wonder whether I could ask you about what the committee considers to be a very important issue: public sector reform. We are all agreed on the need for public sector reform, and one of the most important things is the size of the public sector and how that plays out in the Scottish Government budget.
The other part of that, which you have been discussing with the convener, is the head count in the core civil service. When it comes to determining the size of the core civil service, is that decision made by the First Minister or by you, as permanent secretary? Is it a minister? Who decides on that? Last time, we were left a little bit in the dark about that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Liz Smith
So, we could add that to your successes in your term of office, to go back to the convener’s earlier question about what you see as achievements.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Liz Smith
That was helpful. You will understand why I am asking these questions. This committee has the important job of scrutinising the Government’s budget, and, when it comes to the size of the civil service and the efficiencies that you are making, there is a bit of a grey area with regard to scrutiny, because we like to know that any decisions made are designed to improve outcomes. That is the key thing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Liz Smith
That is helpful. The reason for the framework bill process is to engage effectively with stakeholders on the bill before it is presented in full to Parliament. The more that stakeholders are involved, the more you feel that there is credibility to your bill.
The problem is that our experience has proven that, for a framework bill that is at an early stage, it is almost impossible to get the right idea of the costs from the financial memorandum. I am interested in hearing from the permanent secretary whether the Parliament should be reviewing that difficulty in getting accurate costs as a potential problem.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Liz Smith
That was helpful, and Mr McKee has given the committee a good outline of that, too, but just to be absolutely clear, who is the final decider of the number of people in the core civil service? Is it Mr McKee, as minister; you, as permanent secretary; or the First Minister?