The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1221 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Liz Smith
I make the point because, to go back to the convener鈥檚 question about transparency, the situation becomes increasingly difficult if things are done at the last minute. As you said, if that happens, it is difficult to expand on the implications that a policy change might have for the labour market, inflation or whatever. Therefore, we run the risk of having less accurate forecasting, which concerns us. That is on top of the fact that the SFC and the OBR produce forecasts at different times鈥攖he convener mentioned that lag鈥攚hich compounds the issue.
We have been taking evidence on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development鈥檚 review of how effectively the Scottish Fiscal Commission operates. The SFC was generally given a very clean bill of health. However, an interesting issue was raised about the SFC鈥檚 groundbreaking approach of giving a very long-term projection for the Scottish economy鈥攊t goes all the way up to the year 2070. On one level, that is very helpful, but there is the argument, which was part of some discussion and debate just last weekend, that those very long-term projections slightly take the focus away from short-term policy making to address serious issues in the economy.
I know that you cannot comment on the policy, but are you concerned that, if we go too far into the future, we will have issues with short-term policy making?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you for that helpful answer about the committee set-up.
What can the Parliament do better? I think that there was cross-party frustration鈥攊t is nothing to do with party politics鈥攁t the time of the budget that we had a budget debate that was a bit dead in the water. Each of the committees is asked to make a presentation in the budget debate, which is made by the committee convener and, therefore, must be objective. The limited scope for 成人快手 to debate in that forum is not very helpful and the debate is also constrained by time.
Some of us around the table have been arguing for a finance bill in order to enhance scrutiny, but I wonder whether a structural change in the Parliament, as opposed to committees, could make it easier for there to be good quality scrutiny and whether it could heighten the general interest of 成人快手 in the budget process. It would be quite easy for an MSP to avoid getting involved in the budget, yet it is one of the most important things that we do鈥攕ome would say that it is the most important. Do you have any suggestions about how we could change the structure of the Parliament to improve scrutiny?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Liz Smith
I am sorry to interrupt you, but if those changes come very late in the day, as they did in the reserved and the devolved institutions this time, does that create difficulty with forecasting accurately what you are predicting over the next budget year or subsequent years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Liz Smith
Do you think that the UK Government appreciates that problem?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Liz Smith
I think it is time for a revisit, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Liz Smith
Does that approach work well in Finland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
The Parliament is in need of processes that make it easier to understand where we have spent money well and where we have had issues. That is the crux of the matter.
I will come back to other matters later.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
That is helpful. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
In your answer to the first question this morning, Professor Roy, you set out where you felt there had been improvement in data availability. You then raised some issues about areas in which you thought we could still make improvements. Will you do the same in relation to how effective we are in scrutinising public expenditure? Will you tell us where you think that the data is improving and where you think that we need more data in order to decide how effective we are being in scrutinising public expenditure?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Liz Smith
That is one of the reasons why I am asking the question. You held a Scottish Parliament information centre breakfast seminar on this exact issue, considering the challenge of climate change against other issues. It is essential that the information that we need in order to scrutinise is as available as possible. Where there are different policy choices, politicians have to make decisions about whether those are good or bad, and just getting to the information about effectiveness is absolutely critical, including to this committee. Are there other areas in which we need to boost the data?