The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1189 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Liz Smith
However, that raises an interesting point about whether those who are most in need require better advice and support or whether we need to find an additional pot of money that is specific to their types of needs, because those are two different things.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Liz Smith
Lynne O’Brien argued that women and children find it difficult to navigate the system, which is obviously creating difficulties, so what simplifications would you like to see to overcome the issue?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you for joining us. The most important thing for the committee, as we are looking at all the welfare reforms, is to drill down into the evidence on what works and what is clearly not working so well. I thank the people sitting around the table who have done some great work through their different agencies to try to provide that evidence; it is immensely helpful to us.
Before we get going on some of the other issues, I am interested to know from you, in the context of the difficult debate about welfare reform that is taking place in Westminster and at Holyrood, what evidence is the most important in showing us the direction in which we should be going to get the best possible returns for the most vulnerable people. That is the big question that we are all facing.
Dr Randolph, you are an economist with the Fraser of Allander Institute. Would you like to start us off?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Liz Smith
It is a small “r”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Liz Smith
This is an observation based on what the Auditor General said—namely, that one of the problems here is the lack of a consistent approach. The Auditor General was concerned that it is not easy to discern a consistency of approach, because of the timescales to which the various budget documents—whether we are talking about the budget itself, the medium-term financial strategy or statements about financial sustainability—are published. It is very difficult for people in local government to take on board what they ought to be doing to ensure consistency.
I think that there is a great need for greater consistency of approach in relation to what the Government’s intentions are when it comes to the delivery of policy and how that will be funded. The Auditor General pointed out that, if we had such consistency, we would be able to have better scrutiny.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Liz Smith
Is the Housing (Scotland) Bill that is going through Parliament giving you some hope that some of that can be resolved?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Liz Smith
Is that problem manifesting because the advice is not clear about what can happen and what support is available? Do changes need to be made within the legal framework to allow civil remedies to happen?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you for coming to the committee. You might have heard a bit of the previous evidence session, in which the witnesses suggested that some of the agency support is a bit inconsistent. How do you feel about the homelessness agencies in that regard? Are there inconsistencies across different local authorities?
Also, are there specific changes that need to be discussed and suggestions that need to be put to the Government on the legal framework and the civil remedies that are in place for people who have suffered badly from domestic abuse?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Liz Smith
I have one brief but nevertheless important question. Ms Clelland, your response earlier to Mr MacDonald was very interesting. You said that there are inconsistencies across some of the agencies that are trying to support people in abusive relationships, as well as across local authorities. Have the witnesses come across any concerns that there are inconsistencies in the law, particularly when it comes to civil remedies for people in such circumstances?
I ask that question because, at the beginning of this year, the Scottish Law Commission asked for views to be fed back to it about whether changes need to be made to the law in relation to specific issues with civil remedies, and the results were quite revealing. The people who came back on the question said that there were a lot of issues—about 10 or 11 issues were flagged up. If you think that there are inconsistencies in the law, can you outline them?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Liz Smith
Okay. I will pursue that later. Thank you.