The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Because there is no list of people who could replace them. If you are elected as a constituency MSP, there is no list of people who are behind you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Correct. I have to say that I think that most people in that position would probably not seek to stay on, but they might, and they should have the opportunity to do so.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
There is a difference between being annoyed at a representative and that representative breaking a set of rules. I guess that we have all annoyed people at some point—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
My bill attempts to say, “No, you actually have to come in. You are elected as a member of this Parliament. Members of the public expect that you will occasionally turn up, as you would find in any other workplace, and, if you do not, the ultimate sanction is that you could be removed.”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You are quite right, because you are here to ask questions; that is what the committee is here for. We are here to explore the issues that are raised by the bill. You have raised a really good point, which is that parties have their internal processes. Indeed, I suppose that, as a whip, you can dish out certain punishments, but you cannot remove somebody as an MSP.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You really do.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
My bill deals with the individual, regardless of party. The party does not really come into it. I am giving the individual the opportunity to say to the electorate that they should keep their job, regardless of whether they are backed by their original party. I imagine that there will be a lot of cases in which, if somebody has erred so badly that they are subject to a recall vote—this will happen at some point—the party, whichever one it is, might simply wash its hands of that individual, who might then be on their own. However, they, as an individual, should have the opportunity to say that they should keep their job.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is what my bill is attempting to enable.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Well, that is the reality. The only case that we have had in Scotland was in Rutherglen, when Margaret Ferrier was subject to a recall. We would not have found a single person in Rutherglen who was not aware of what was going on.
I accept that there are greater challenges when it comes to regional ˿, because there is more ground to cover. There would have to be a lot of publicity and a good deal of education. If the system that I am proposing was accepted, we would have to explain to people why they were being asked to vote or go to the polls twice.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
She might well do that. There are some geographically huge regions, but if we are going to have a system, we just have to work it out. We just have to accept it.