The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am confident that the members of this committee would ensure that stuff did not leak. It would be a serious matter if it did. Membership of this committee comes with certain responsibilities, and confidentiality is one of them. I have never sat on this committee, but I am sure that you deal with things that are confidential, and there have been no leaks. We just have to trust members of this committee to do their job.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It is very important. I just would not be comfortable with setting a figure鈥攁nd certainly not 10 per cent.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I know. I really do not think that the threat of a fearsome whip is enough, to be honest. Actual hard-and-fast rules need to be set down, otherwise the scenario that I have set out is possible. What if somebody just decided to ignore you, Ms Mackay?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It would be difficult. There are some very large regions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is correct.
At the moment, it is possible for any of us to decide not to come in, and that is wrong. That cannot be right. My starting point was that, because I had been a councillor, I knew the law that applied to councillors, which is very clear: if you do not attend for six months, you can be removed but you will not necessarily be removed. For example, I took part in a vote in South Lanarkshire Council about a colleague鈥攏ot a party colleague鈥攚ho had been off. I will not say why they were off, but they were and there was a very good reason why. The council decided that they should be allowed to continue, and that individual is still a councillor.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes. Let me put it another way: if we are being honest, nobody really knows who they are going to get when they put that cross on the ballot for the regional list. They end up with who they end up with. For that regional element, nobody voted for me individually鈥攂ut if I were to be subject to a recall vote, people would have heard of me, because I would probably have done something. Then it is about the individual MSP and their behaviour鈥攐r alleged behaviour鈥攏ot about the party. In my view, that individual should have the chance to make their case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
My thoughts are that, if we accept that there is a two-step process for constituency members鈥攚e might not鈥攖hen we should be consistent and have a similar process for regional members. If we were to change to a one-step process for regional members鈥攊n which case we would not have the 10 per cent threshold; we would just do away with that鈥攚e would have only one vote on whether that person should stay or go. If we did that, however, why would we not have a one-step process for a constituency member and go straight to a by-election?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You are asking whether people should be able to disagree, and that is not an unreasonable proposal. Perhaps that could be explored at stage 2.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that it is enough that somebody is incarcerated.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that somebody would have to be in jail.