The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2466 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Before I ask you about community engagement, I want to push back a bit on your view about flooding. You will correct me if I am wrong, but what I picked up from what you said is that you think that flooding is driven entirely by climate change. I am not disputing that climate change is a factor, but exhibit 2 in your report sets out various reasons for flooding. There is river flooding, surface water flooding, erosion-enhanced flooding, coastal flooding and groundwater flooding. We have also spoken about housing developments, which can exacerbate the risk of flooding. Therefore, do you accept that, although climate change is a factor, it is not the only thing that can cause flooding?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I will go on to community engagement briefly. We have touched on it a bit. Paragraph 77 on page 33 of your report says:
“Overall, there are major barriers to meaningful engagement for both public bodies and communities. This includes issues and barriers around consultations on major flood schemes”—
we have just spoken about one—
“as well as engagement around broader resilience activity.”
Will you provide some detail on what the “barriers to meaningful engagement” are?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Do you have any examples of that disinterest?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to follow on from Jamie Greene’s line of questioning and ask you about a specific project that you mention in the report: the Grangemouth flood protection scheme. It is a very good example of what we have talked about, which is how costs have spiralled and responsibilities have changed. In 2015, the cost was estimated to be £108 million; now, it is as much as £672 million, and the scheme is not off the ground yet.
A task force has been set up that involves Falkirk Council, which clearly cannot afford even a fraction of that sum, and the Scottish Government. I will give you some figures that tell you about the scheme’s massive size: it will provide around 17 miles of flood defences, which will involve walls, embankments and floodgates; and it will protect more than 6,000 people, 2,700 homes, 1,200 commercial properties and 14 miles of roads in the surrounding area. What is your understanding of the situation and how the scheme should be progressed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Graham Simpson
That is a comprehensive answer. I am very aware of the time, and I know that Mr Brown is itching to get in, but I have one more question on this subject. When someone is a victim of flooding, they need instant information and help, probably from the council—they want it to step in. Have you uncovered any issues with community engagement, or lack of it, in that respect?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Good morning, gents. If it is okay, I want to look at some of the losses that the bank has incurred so far. We had a very useful evidence session with the bank, and we accept that the nature of its work is that there will be losses—and there have been losses; from what I can see, there have been a couple. We know about Circularity Scotland, and we can come back to that, but there has been a more recent one—M Squared Lasers Ltd. What is your understanding of the potential loss there?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Graham Simpson
However, potentially the loss could be all ÂŁ34 million.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I am saying that, potentially, the loss could be all ÂŁ34 million. I am not saying that it will be, but, potentially, it could be.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Mr Hogg seems to want to say something.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I do not know whether that is an acceptable level of loss or not. It seems quite small, and you could get a return on the bank’s investments in other companies. That is the nature of it—I get that—but it is important that I ask about this particular investment, because it is quite recent.