The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
I found Graeme Dey and his predecessor, Joe FitzPatrick, to be very good to work with. When they appeared at the committee, we had a very cordial relationship and they knew the committee鈥檚 requirements.
We had some correspondence with you last week about the vaccination passport debate and the proposal from the Scottish Government to introduce a requirement for vaccine certification at certain events. You will have seen our annual report from the previous parliamentary session in which we expressed some concern, shall we say, over the number of made affirmative regulations that were being approved. For anyone who is watching, I note that that is when the Government brings in a law without its having been scrutinised by the Parliament; the scrutiny comes later. Most parliamentarians accept that there has been a need to use that procedure during Covid, but there has been a large number of such instruments.
We wrote to you about the proposal for vaccine passports. That might not be the term that you use, but that is the term that I use. We know what we are talking about. You wrote back to us on 9 September鈥攊t was a quick turnaround鈥攁nd in that letter you said that if there were to be regulations, which there would have to be if the proposal comes in, your view is that the made affirmative procedure should still be used despite there being weeks to prepare. Is that still your position?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
It would be useful for the committee to have something from you about which SLC reports you anticipate implementing and which you do not. Then we will know what we are working with.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
That would be useful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
When we had a private meeting with your officials, we asked about the area of questioning that Mr Sweeney has just covered. We specifically asked whether the Government could provide us with a list of outstanding regulations that flow from acts that have been passed and I am not sure that we have seen that. Mr Sweeney mentioned the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019, but there will be a number of others. I think that there is still some stuff outstanding from the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019. It would be useful to have that list, if we could.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
I will move on to discuss the Scottish Law Commission. As you know, the committee works closely with the SLC, as do you, and there has been long-standing frustration from the SLC鈥攁nd from us, but particularly from the SLC鈥攁bout the amount of work that it has done and the number of reports that it has produced that have just stacked up and not resulted in legislation.
The SLC has provided us with a list of about 18 of its reports dating back as far as 2006 that have not ended up as legislation, covering things from electoral law to level crossings. All kinds of serious work has gone on and the SLC and the committee are very frustrated. In the previous parliamentary session, the committee worked with the Parliament on a set of protocols that would allow the committee to take on more bills, if they were presented. That would help the Parliament to get stuff through.
The programme for government said that the Government wants to do something on moveable transactions. When do you see that legislation being introduced and would it be a bill that meets the criteria for it to be considered by this committee?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
I want to follow up on that. Like the minister, I am a football fan. If I go to a football match, I show somebody at the gate my QR code, and he or she scans it into their personal mobile phone. That is what it will be鈥攖hat is what the Government said last week. My concern is that my name, address and date of birth could show up on that person鈥檚 mobile phone. That, to me, is a breach of my data.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
Do you anticipate all of those coming in this calendar year or within the next 12 months?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
I am sure that we can improve as we go along. Others might want to come in at this point, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
Right鈥攐kay. I will move on to my final question for now, although I have more questions later.
As you mentioned, we have highlighted that we are not persuaded by some of the reasoning that the Scottish Government has provided for breaching the 28-day rule for negative instruments. Will you expand on what work you are doing to ensure that such breaches occur only when absolutely necessary?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Graham Simpson
It sounds as though there might be some movement and that you might not necessarily use the made affirmative procedure.