The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
It can indeed, but it covers such a wide area. The Education, Children and Young People Committee has already taken evidence that included a view that some of the education provisions may be unlawful. If the bill goes through, you run the risk of facing legal challenge. Even if it was just a narrow legal challenge relating to the education part, the whole thing could fall. From my point of view, I do not like the bill, full stop. From your point of view, you want to get it through, but the whole thing could fall because you have decided to lump it together and there might be a legal challenge.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
We can maybe look at that.
A general question is that the bill covers a wide range of areas, from education, tenancy rights and justice to health matters. Why did you put all that in one bill and not split it up? Some things in the bill are quite far reaching. For example, on tenancy rights, you could argue that what is in the bill has nothing to do with public health and everything to do with tenancy rights and changing rental law in this country. Why not introduce a separate bill on that? Work is already going on in the area and consultations are out there. Why not do it in that way?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
You are in front of me and he is not. I am asking you about your bill.
I have two more short questions. I will put something to you because of your response to the convener’s question about the power to release people from prison early. He said—rightly—that that related just to Covid but that the rest of the bill is rather wider. I will read out something that you say in the delegated powers memorandum; I am not really commenting on it, but I found it curious. In your justification for using delegated powers, you say:
“In addition to Covid, there have been relatively recent outbreaks of new diseases, SARS and MERS, and instances of contamination, such as Salisbury.”
The Salisbury situation was limited to Salisbury. Why is that in there?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I am sorry, convener—I asked about a specific aspect of the bill, and I do not think that the Deputy First Minister has addressed that point. The point is—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
There has never been a need for that. You have relied on guidance. Why can you not rely on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I want to go back to the point about freeing prisoners early, because I am genuinely struggling to understand the logic of your position, Mr Swinney. Obviously, we do not want to be in the position of freeing people early, but your position appears to be that, if that is Covid related, we should consider doing that, and if it is not Covid related, we should not consider it.
Earlier, I read out a quote from your delegated powers memorandum. I will read out another bit:
“Delegated powers are appropriate to deal with future public health threats that could pose a significant risk to human health as they are, by their nature, unpredictable and sometimes unforeseeable.”
Your rationale for the entire bill is that the powers are needed because we do not know what will happen in the future; that could be the stuff that you listed in that document or something else. However, when it comes to releasing prisoners early, you want to restrict that power just to Covid-related matters. There appears to be no logic to that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
It is an illogical position. It would be more logical to remove that provision entirely from the bill.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Did the instrument appear in the committee papers a couple of weeks ago, or was that something similar?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
The next provision relates to vaccination and immunisation. According to the policy note, the regulations allow people to be vaccinated or immunised against “any disease”, not just Covid, by someone who is not a medical practitioner. Can you explain the practicalities around that provision?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
That is useful. The next section relates to education institutions and childcare premises. Your policy note says:
“To date the power to give “educational closure directions” ... has not been used. It is considered unnecessary to extend this power in addition to the power to give educational continuity directions”.
That is fine; you do not want that power. However, you do want powers to close boarding accommodation and student accommodation. Why do you need those powers?