The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2042 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I am not really sure whether that was a yes or a no; I think that it was a no.
Convener, I have not touched on the local authorities instrument. If somebody else wants to pick up on that, that is fine, but I am happy to ask about that instrument if you want.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Bring in Bill Kidd. My question was on the other instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
That was a very useful session that we had with the Deputy First Minister just now.
The instrument deals with a number of areas. I could be content with some of them, but there is one that I am really not comfortable with, which is the power to close student accommodation and boarding accommodation. As we heard during the earlier discussion, the power has never been used during the entire pandemic鈥攖he Government has relied on guidance鈥攕o I can see no justification for hanging on to it for another six months. I do not think that Mr Swinney made a compelling argument for doing so. If the Government did not use a power鈥攚hich was an emergency power鈥攄uring the height of the pandemic, I can see no justification for hanging on to it now that we are in a much better place than we have been.
The instrument throws up the issue of what happens when we, as parliamentarians, are asked to approve instruments that contain a number of provisions, some of which we like and some of which we do not. There needs to be some flexibility in the system to allow us all to pick and choose. If that could be reported to the lead committee, that would be useful.
On the basis that I do not like one of the provisions, I will vote against the instrument, but I would much rather have the ability to pick off any provisions that I do not like. However, that option is unfortunately not available to us. On that basis, I will vote against it.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
So this just gives people the option to register a death remotely.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Okay. I thought that it might be useful to go through the instrument in question, which contains a number of provisions, and to hear your thoughts on each of them. I might not cover them all, but I will go through them quickly. Some are quite straightforward.
The first provision relates to the ability to register deaths and stillbirths remotely. Does that give people a choice? Does it have to be done remotely, or can people still pop into an office to register a death or stillbirth in person?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
The instrument gives councils a power over public outdoor spaces, and we could describe parks in that way. Why would councils need powers to do anything in public outdoor spaces for the next six months?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
You have not, however, used those powers.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
As we heard earlier, the instrument extends the powers given to councils for another six months in relation to premises, events and public outdoor spaces. Given where we are with the health situation, I cannot see a justification for councils hanging on to those powers for another six months. In the circumstances, I will vote against the instrument.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Graham Simpson
Far from the minister saying that she will be prepared to, or could, call in schemes or direct councils on what the charges should be, she is clearly not prepared to do that.
She mentioned Nottingham, which is a very interesting example. Nottingham is about to increase what it charges companies. The reason for that鈥攖he minister, probably, and Mr Ruskell, certainly, will rejoice at this鈥攊s that the money that is taken in by the Nottingham scheme has gone down, because fewer people need parking spaces. Mr Ruskell will think that that is a good thing. However, in order to fill the gap, the council is increasing the charges. That leads us to the conclusion that, in Nottingham, the example so lauded by some people around this table, the charge is actually a money-making scheme.
If the minister wants to press ahead with the scheme, she should at least fix the cap element of the regulations. I am sure that she could do that.
Exemptions have been mentioned, and the Scottish Police Federation made some very strong comments about that. Calum Steele, its general secretary, fears that the charge could be passed on to rank-and-file police officers. However, if it were not to be passed on to them, it could hit overstretched police budgets.
Unions have come out against the scheme. Keir Greenaway, senior organiser for GMB Scotland, said that the lowest-paid workers would suffer at the worst possible time, with the rising cost of living. He is absolutely right.
As I pointed out two weeks ago, more than half of the employers in Nottingham have passed the parking levy, which is set to be nearly 拢500 a year per parking space, on to their staff. Some of those staff will be low paid. The scheme is a regressive tax.