The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Graham Simpson
The issue of the House of Lords is not an easy one. It is an easy one if you are against the House of Lords, but if you are not—if you think that the House of Lords should exist—the question is whether you should allow a leave of absence, which, as you rightly say, one current member of the Scottish Parliament enjoys at the moment. Where are you on that? Should the leave of absence exist?
10:45Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Right, because I was going to follow on from your line of questioning—
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You mentioned self-assessment and talked about people marking their own homework, which is what self-assessment can be. Your report highlights variation in how boards carry that out. Why is there variation? Should there be greater consistency?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Are all the boards using the blueprint? When you suggest external validation of blueprint self-assessments, who are you thinking of to carry that out?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Let us see how well I do on the issue of boards and board chairs. There was mention of Forth Valley. NHS Forth Valley’s current interim chair is Neena Mahal, who was the chair of NHS Lanarkshire. Is there an issue there? There is clearly a problem recruiting new chairs. Alison Cumming mentioned the aspiring chairs programme, which appears to consist of people who are already in the system. Do we need to be doing more to attract new people who are not in the system? Do we risk having this almost revolving door of chairs jumping from one board to another—the sort of cross-pollination that Colin Beattie mentioned?
11:00Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
How do you think the blueprint for good governance is going? How could it be improved?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Who should carry out the external validation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. That would be useful.
A letter was published yesterday by the public policy institute, Enlighten. It was written by 13 senior medical professionals and executives in Scotland. It was an open letter, published in the press and, I think, on Enlighten’s website. Top people have signed up to it. It says:
“We recognise that many people are well served by the NHS in Scotland, and that thousands of dedicated and hard-working people ensure that compassionate and effective, sometimes lifesaving, care is provided on a day-to-day basis. And yet, as has also been acknowledged, the current system of delivering health care and social care in Scotland is unsustainable, often stretched beyond capacity, overly complicated, difficult to navigate, often inefficient and is perceived as not always meeting the needs of people living in Scotland.”
There is a lot more to the letter, but it says—and this is where it relates to your report—that the NHS is “overly complicated”. The letter is potentially touching on governance, which is what your report is about. Could you explain why you think that governance is so important and why changing the governance and simplifying it will make a difference to the people who use the NHS in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Thanks, chair. Have you finished your questions, chair?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That makes the point. You have five boards that have marked themselves down, and maybe they deserve to be marked down—I do not know—but having someone external to make sure that they are not being too hard on themselves would be useful. I will leave it there, convener, thank you.