The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Why is it an issue in the central belt in particular?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is what it says; that is the whole point of this discussion.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It all comes down to core funding.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
People often get tests done at their GP practice. Will they be able to get those results through the app?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am sorry to keep mentioning England, but it just seems to be more advanced in many areas. As you know, in England, GPs are required to provide a certain amount of information. Presumably, that allows NHS England to plan better—because it has more data from GP practices. Why are we not doing that here?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am on a roll here, Ms Gallacher.
We do not know how many GP practices operate the appointment system that is described as the 8 am rush. We asked about that earlier, and we do not have that information. Do you not think that we should?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is just a buzz phrase; it means nothing. We do not have the information.
I see that Mr McDonnell is trying to come to your rescue.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That strikes me as a ludicrous situation. Dr Morrison, you identified that there is a ÂŁ290 million funding gap. If the Scottish Government was to come up with ÂŁ290 million, what would that get us?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
The data question is quite important for the whole of the NHS, is it not? It would be good to know how many patients GPs are seeing, what the booking system is—that is only part of it—how many people are going through the system and what they are being seen for. In England, I believe that GPs are now required to provide a certain level of information, which they are doing, but we are not doing so here.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You probably did not see the whole of the previous evidence session. It was all pretty stark, but it ended with a figure from the BMA’s survey of its members, which found that 90 per cent of GPs in Scotland were prepared to take disruptive action because things have got so bad out there for doctors. They are under stress, they are suffering burnout and there are not enough of them. How have we got to a situation in which 90 per cent of Scotland’s GPs are prepared to take disruptive action?