The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2215 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Graham Simpson
What is the answer?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Graham Simpson
In the interests of time, I will go back to the Prestwick airport situation. I am trying to understand the process. What happens when somebody approaches the airport with an expression of interest in buying it? First, it goes to the board, and the board should then tell you that there has been an expression of interest. What happens after that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Graham Simpson
Is it the case that you take your main advice from the board, or is it actually your decision? If the board said, “Actually, we don’t really want to sell,” which is my impression of the board, could you potentially take a different view and say to the board, “Well, no, this actually looks okay to us.”?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
I did not think that you would tell me, but I had to ask. I want to pursue the point, however, because it is a really serious issue. If those four colleges do not get the extra money that they need, are they at risk of closing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
Thanks very much, convener. I will ask about that report but, initially, I have a question for Karen Watt to help me to understand the Funding Council’s role in respect of individual colleges. How involved are you at that level? Do you, for example, attend board meetings?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
That is good. Some good has come of that session, so I am glad that you watched it.
The report that you referred to, which has just come out, made for an interesting read. It is gloomy reading, to be frank. In it, you say:
“The financial position of”
ł§ł¦´ÇłŮ±ô˛ą˛Ô»ĺ’s
“colleges is deteriorating.”
You have said that already. You also say that their position is—this is an interesting phrase—“extremely fluid”. What did you mean by that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
I looked at the table that you refer to, which seems to list every college in Scotland. It demonstrates that, sometimes, colleges can make forecasts that do not quite turn out to be accurate at the end of the day. The committee members can look at the report for themselves, but I have had the benefit of seeing it. It is gloomy. On the financial health of the sector, it says:
“Colleges ... operate in an extremely tight fiscal environment”.
It also says:
“The sector is forecasting an … operating deficit”
and that
“The financial position of colleges is deteriorating.”
In the next section, the report goes on to outline the risks to colleges’ financial health. Staff costs are one of those, and that has come out in evidence as a big risk. There is a whole list of risks, so I will not go through them, but the forecast is pretty dire, is it not?
Maybe that is a question for Mr Rennick rather than Karen Watt.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
One section of the report, which we have referred to already, is on staffing. The report says that there is an expected reduction of around 2,300 full-time equivalent staff in the college sector, which is one in five staff. How will colleges be able to continue with that reduced level of staffing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
You are saying that four colleges have significant issues. I do not want to put words in your mouth but, to summarise, the Government might have to bail them out through the SFC.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Graham Simpson
Okay. I want to ask quickly about arm’s-length foundations. Indeed, this point is mentioned in the recent report. It is really a question for you again, Karen Watt. In a previous evidence session, I mentioned the fact that we saw quite a large transfer of money to the arm’s-length foundation in South Lanarkshire in 2022. It was half a million pounds; it was extremely unusual. I do not really want to ask about that particular college, but what can those funds be used for and what can they not be used for?