The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I apologise for the phraseology, but I think that the bill is quite clear about what I am trying to achieve. It is not about dealing with people who are “not performing properly”, because that is subjective.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is the key issue, really, and it is something that I really wrestled with when I was thinking about the bill. For a while, I did not have a solution and I just thought that I was going to have to give up on recall; then it hit me that I was thinking about it in the wrong way. If we are going to have a power of recall—and all parties in the Parliament seem to agree that we should have something—we must address the fact that we have this odd electoral system, which I have said in this committee that I do not like, but which we are stuck with, so I must work with it.
For constituency members, it is relatively straightforward—we can almost mirror the system in Westminster and improve on it, as I said last week. We could ultimately have the best recall system in the United Kingdom at the end of this. However, we also must balance that with the fact that we have regional members.
With a constituency member who is subject to recall, there are two stages. First, the voters are asked whether the member should be recalled, and, secondly, there is a by-election if a threshold is met. What struck me about that approach was that the member, should they wish to proceed—some will not—would be able to put their case to the electors and say why they should stay on. When looking at the regional situation, I wondered whether it would be fair to replicate that process as closely as possible. Although I accept that there will be an enormous cost if that ever comes about, it seemed to me that it would be fair—and, ultimately, fair to the member—to have that two-stage process. I think that most of us in this room are regional members. If it were any of us, I think that we would want the ability to put our case to the electorate if we wished to fight the recall, because otherwise—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Oh, no—definitely not.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Correct. It is not for me to get into individual court cases. I mentioned that particular case because it happened and serious offences were involved. To merit that somebody be jailed for six months, the crime would have to be of a sufficient seriousness. However, I do not think that we should list in the bill the offences that would be covered.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes, but you have asked me about constituency members, and what you have tried to do in your question is conflate the regional element with what happens for constituencies. If a constituency member decides to stand down, there is a by-election. If a regional member decides to stand down, there is no by-election; they are simply replaced. If we were to conflate the two, we might have to revisit the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) (Scotland) Act 2025, and I am not sure that Jamie Hepburn would be too happy about that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I see what you mean. I will go back to what I said earlier. If a member is subject to recall, it is likely to mean a good deal of publicity. They will have done something pretty bad. Any regional member who might not be widely known will suddenly become widely known—that can pretty much be guaranteed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I put that question to you. I throw it out to the committee. If the committee is thinking that way, it needs to consider that if we are going to do something with the regional element, we would have to look at the constituency element as well. Otherwise, it is not fair.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am not sure that I understand that question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I will bring in Ben on that one, because we have covered that issue in the policy memorandum.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
No, absolutely not—10 per cent is not enough to kick somebody out of a Parliament.