The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
The problem is that I am not clear what the policy intent is behind Bob Doris’s amendment. I really am not. I am pretty sure that other committee members who have been listening as closely as I have will also be unclear about that. However, we can be clear that, were we to agree to the amendment—I am pleased to hear that Mr Doris is minded not to move it, but we will discover that later—we could end up in a situation in which ministers have a huge list of people and a long list of countries across the globe with which they are expected to consult. I just think that that would be completely impractical. I am pretty sure that the minister would say that as well. Hopefully, Mr Doris will not move amendment 187.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
Just for clarity, I point out that Maurice Golden’s amendment 151 would not require ministers to set up a new body; the actual wording is that they must “designate” a body as an advisory body. I have heard what the minister has had to say, but is she against the principle of having such an advisory body?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I am curious to know what you mean by “regions”. Do you mean regions in Scottish parliamentary terms or are you referring to the old-style regions that we used to have in Scotland? I am just not clear. When we have something in law, we need to be clear about what we mean.
My second question is on the same theme. What do you mean by “communities”? That could mean different things to different people.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
Will the member take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I am glad that Mr Doris has finished there. I think that the most important thing is the language that we use when we lodge amendments. If someone is going to lodge an amendment that includes phrases such as “the Global South”, I would suggest, convener, that they really ought to know what they mean by that. It is not really good enough for Mr Doris to say that it is all down to SCIAF and that he does not really know what “the Global South” means.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I say to Monica Lennon that that is why I have provided the committee with a choice of six months or one year.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Graham Simpson
Thank you for inviting me.
You will be aware that I have a member’s bill proposal going on. There are three elements to it, one of which is recall. We will not talk about that today, because it is quite complex. There are two other elements, one of which is around what we do with ˿ who fail to turn up for work for a certain period of time. At the moment, how we deal with ˿ is different to how we deal with councillors, so I am trying to make it the same.
In relation to the bill that we are discussing, the Government’s policy memorandum deals with what happens when councillors are jailed for a certain period, as opposed to what happens when ˿ are jailed for a certain period. Currently, the law is that if an MSP is jailed for more than 12 months, they will lose their job. That very useful policy memorandum raises the issue that there is a difference between that situation and the situation with councillors; it appears that the time period for councillors is more than three months, rather than more than 12 months. The memorandum asks whether that should be dealt with, possibly at stage 2.
The proposal that I make in my bill, which you will not have seen yet—the bill is being drafted at the moment and I expect that it will be ready before the summer recess—is to reduce the period for ˿ to six months. That would still leave a disparity, so should we deal with that issue in the bill that we are looking at today as opposed to dealing with it in my bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I would be very happy to work with you on that basis.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Graham Simpson
What the minister said was very useful, so you will probably be seeing me at stage 2.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I will stick with you. You said that seven prisons are at red status. What does red status mean?