The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2212 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Let us deal with the financial element first. Obviously, there have been conflicting views—the figures that I have put forward are different from the Government’s figures. I will bring in Ben McKendrick, who did a lot of work on that. He can perhaps explain how we arrived at those figures.
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Some of that will be left to regulations—indeed, quite a lot of the bill allows the Government to make regulations. If we are talking about regional provision, I have said that there should be up to 10 signing places. Ben, am I right in saying that it is up to 10 across the region?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes—up to 10 in each constituency. It does not have to be 10, but it could be up to 10, and it is obviously important that those are in the right places. Clearly, I will not set out in a bill where signing places should be; that could be left to regulations.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I am dealing with people who fall foul of the rules. In relation to the whips, I am glad that I do not have to answer to you, Ms Mackay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I would not recommend that, but they could do that. They could just take the huff and say, “I’m not coming in.”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
They have.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It has certainly caused me to think about it, but I have arrived at the same conclusion, which is that it is important that, in the first step of signing the petition, we examine the strength of feeling in the constituency or region. If the petition were stopped once it reached the threshold of 10 per cent of those eligible to sign, we would not really know what the feeling was.
There might be an overwhelming number—let us say 90 per cent, although I do not think that it would ever get to that—of people in a constituency or region saying that there should be a recall vote, which would send a message to the member who was the subject of the petition that the game was up and they might not want to push it any further. If the petition were just closed at 10 per cent, we would never know. That is why I think that it is important that we do not stop it at 10 per cent.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Well, 10 per cent is the threshold, but it is important to get the actual figure, and that is why I would not stop it at 10 per cent. I understand the argument and I have considered it. It would be cheaper, and if saving money is the aim, we could stop a recall petition at 10 per cent. However, it gives the electorate a chance to have their say and it is important that we know what the figure is.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Absolutely not. I am just using him as an example of someone who has switched parties in the current parliamentary session.
09:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that the subjective bit that you might be referring to is the non-attendance part and the reasonable excuses for not coming—Rona Mackay has been exploring those questions. I was very clear when I was considering that provision that I would not target people who just do not turn up. Many people in any workplace—and I consider this a workplace—might not go to work for very good reasons. However, there will be a whole host of reasons and I do not think that we can list them in the bill. Life is complicated and we must accept that. People have different things going on in their lives at different times, and I think that, if you are unable to come to work physically for any reason, there ought to be a mechanism for explaining that privately. There will be a subjective test there—