˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 544 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 13 November 2024

Maurice Golden

I have a final question. NatureScot’s website says that

“farmers and crofters do not face any additional bureaucracy within National Parks”

and that they can receive additional support. However, NFU Scotland has said that the majority of its members feel that

“existing national parks have failed to make a positive contribution to farming and crofting.”

What is your response to those concerns?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 13 November 2024

Maurice Golden

Thank you, convener, and I welcome the witnesses to the meeting.

I will start at the beginning. When the existing national parks were assessed, what sort of evidence was sought or research conducted to inform whether a new park should be put in place?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 13 November 2024

Maurice Golden

I am slightly confused. Is the consultation about various iterations of the Galloway national park, including its geography and the infrastructure that it might house, or is the consultation about whether the park should or should not go ahead?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

Thanks for that. I am having an issue with the response to local community demand. There does not need to be an exact blueprint, but there should be a vision or an indication of what that might look like.

John, you take a wider view on national parks. More generally, can you see there being a blueprint for a national park that differs from the two existing ones that we have, or do you think that that is naturally where it would broadly lead to? On the Galloway park specifically, what might that look like and how might it be presented to local communities to allow them to make an assessment of whether they want it?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

As we know, diversification gets into tourism, about which we have heard, wind turbines, solar farms, battery storage—yes, okay. Back to you, convener.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

Which is fine, as long as you do not state that one of your aims is response to local community demand. If it is a policy decision that this must happen, that is up to the Scottish Government, but you cannot then say that it is because the community supports it, I would argue. It reeks a bit of George Orwell’s “1984”. Ian McKinnon, would you like to come in?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

On the definition of a national park, do the witnesses in the room think that the people of Galloway understand what is being presented, and is there a clear vision of what a national park would be? Wrapped around that question, what formal processes have NatureScot or the Scottish Government conducted to date?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

Where was the hub?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

It strikes me that it would be beneficial for the Scottish Government, via NatureScot, to come up with a vision that provides the detail of the Galloway national park that would allow communities to make a decision. It sounds as though communities are being asked to sign a blank cheque for something when they do not know how it is going to impact on them. The concept of national parks could be different for different people, and therefore people’s assessments with regard to whether or not they support a national park could be radically different. It seems that, as it is envisaged, the consultation process will not allow communities to come to a conclusion on any of that. In some ways, asking for the level of local community demand for something when people do not know what something is, is an impossible task. Do you have thoughts on how to square that circle?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 30 October 2024

Maurice Golden

Thanks. To finish off, Denise, what would be your top three concerns around a new national park in Galloway?