The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
I would like to hear from the builders around the table, but can I ask the question in another way? Supposing some of your stock had the same cladding on it that Grenfell had, are you telling me that you would still need to clarify the processes and so on to act immediately to remove that? Surely not. Surely, if you know that the material on any of your buildings is risky and should be removed, you can act without demanding further clarity. I have to say to you that constituents talk to me about this. It sounds as though we are hiding behind process issues rather than taking on board the action that needs to be taken when we know that it needs to be taken in many cases. Is that a fair or unfair assessment?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
Thanks and good morning. From listening to the conversation so far—and I am trying to place myself in the position of someone who has bought a property from you and lives in that property with this continuing risk—I get the feeling that the lack of progress has been pinned on complexities in the legislation, rather than the focus being on making the houses that people live in safe. Have you assessed your own stock over the 30-year period that the legislation covers and do you know which properties you built fall within the remit of the bill to have the cladding remediated? The big question is whether there is anything that you could have done or could do reasonably to address that, given that you know the condition of the buildings and the cladding that you may have. Is there anything that you could be doing outwith the complexities that you are describing this morning to get on with it, as some of the people in the previous panel were asking us all to do?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
In the interests of time, no. I thank the witnesses very much for those contributions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
Yes, but, in your view, this is about Scottish building standards somehow slowing that process down. That was the sense that I got from you earlier—that, if only we could adopt the same standards as apply down south, that would somehow speed up the process in Scotland.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
I will leave it at that. Thanks very much.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you. Colleagues, should the bill be clearer about timescales for completion? It would not be usual to put deadlines and so on in a bill, but what do colleagues around the table feel about including in the bill some real hard and fast deadlines for completion of this work, from when the single building assessments are completed to actually getting the work done? Should we be firmer about including guidance on that in the bill?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
Hi, folks. I am the MSP for Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
I would like to go back to the point about how we could hasten progress and what the barriers to that are. We talked about building standards, and I think that Julie Jackson replied to a point about that. In Scotland, we are particularly proud of our building standards, and the legislation is more rigorous than that which applies down south. Julie, I have to come back to you on that point. Are you saying that Scotland should either loosen, slacken, lessen or abandon our building standards in order to make further progress?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning, everyone. Thank you for coming to do this work. I particularly want to ask for views on the impacts on the social rented sector, which has been mentioned a couple of times.
First, however, I would like to ask about the 1992 starting point in the bill. I think that that mirrors the UK Government’s legislation. Could the panel offer any views about why that should be the starting point for the 30-year timeframe in the bill? Is it fairly arbitrary, or does the problem with cladding materials only involve buildings constructed in the last 30 years? Do we have the intelligence or knowledge to be sure about that? Is it the panel’s view that there should not be an arbitrary starting point—for example, 1992—within legislation that applies in the UK?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning. On the previous conversation about books, I hope that we are not going down the road to where politicians can determine what people can and cannot or should and should not read. People who make purchases must be able to justify them within whatever framework they have in place. If we ever reach a position where people say, “You must not and cannot read this book,” that is not a direction of travel that I would like to follow.
On the issue about the Post Office that Mr Simpson raised, is it your understanding, permanent secretary, that the Post Office and Fujitsu will also provide a compensation fund for the cases that emerged as a result of the Post Office scandal?