The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
The report says that the approval of the £77,000 for the Harvard training course was picked up by “the auditor”. Was that an external or an internal auditor?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
I thought that I would mention that, because it was a positive side of what the chief executive described last week with regard to a range of indicators that are of interest to members.
Auditor General, I remember that your predecessors, Caroline Gardner and Bob Black, both said to the committee over several years that there was a need for service redesign and transformation. We know that demand on the NHS is going through the roof—it went through the roof during Covid, and it has not yet dissipated.
Have the recommendations for service redesign and transformation that you are urging the Government to embrace changed in any way since then? Is the model for service transformation that your predecessors envisaged the model that you are recommending now, given the huge change in demand in recent years?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
That is what I was going to ask about. Is that model getting people out the door more quickly at the other end and back into the community or to where they are supposed to go? Is it succeeding in that regard?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Digital transformation can offer opportunities, as you also say in your report. Are there, throughout the system, blockages that e-health strategies, telehealth or any other way of embracing digital technology might help to unblock? Could those things help with queues that people face in relation to general practitioner contact or consultation services? Do you see opportunity in that and are we embracing enough of the opportunities to help us?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you, convener, and good morning, colleagues.
This meeting is not particularly pleasant. I have been a member of the Parliament—and of the Public Audit Committee, on and off—for 17 years now, and I have to be honest with you and say that this is one of the worst sessions that I have ever participated in.
I have a few questions that I would like to ask Mr Rathjen. On whether the expense was retrospectively approved, you said that, ultimately, it did not make a difference, because it had already been incurred. Why would you do that? Why would you not state your case and say that it was unapproved? You cannot approve something that is clearly not approvable, if you understand my meaning. Why did you not do that? Ultimately, the public would like to know what the difference is between approving something and not approving it. If there is no difference in outcome, what is the point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
I will come to the audit in a minute, but what would have happened in Government if you had not approved it? Surely there would be a difference between approving it and not approving it.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Turning to the issue of audit, I note that the issue was picked up by an auditor, but I am not sure whether that was an internal or external audit. Can somebody clarify whether an external or internal auditor picked up this issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Why was it not picked up by the internal audit team? Is there an internal audit team?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Did declaring it as an options appraisal somehow give some comfort with regard to making that decision and not seeking approval? It is clearly not a tender process—an options appraisal is not a tender process. Who introduced the notion that it was an options appraisal process and therefore did not need Scottish Government approval?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
I really appreciate all of that, but are you saying that what happened cannot happen again? There should be no need for a quiet word from the Auditor General before the sponsor team becomes aware that something has happened. There must be some sort of earlier, better and quicker engagement to stop such a problem arising. Internal audit did not fail: instead, it was ignored, because of the circumstances that your colleagues have described. You were not aware of that until the tail end, and that must change. The sponsorship relationship should be closer and more engaged in whatever way is necessary.