łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 23 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2297 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Community Wealth Building

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Yes. Good morning, everybody. That brings me neatly to my question. Can we have successful community wealth building if, at the same time, there is dereliction and abandonment in our urban environment in particular? All our towns have that problem, and it seems almost impossible—try as I might—to get a change of attitude from owners to the premises that they own.

Local people can have a sense that they own the town or village in which they live, but they do not. The buildings in our towns, villages and so on are usually owned by people who have never gone there and never will, and who probably do not care.

How do we turn that particular problem around? Are there any examples of that with regard to buildings in an urban setting in particular? We could talk all day about the strategies and policies that we need to implement, but the people who live in our towns and villages are still seeing that level of dereliction and abandonment in front of their eyes. I would be grateful for any responses. I have heard from Louise Kirk of some good examples in Ayrshire, but I would be pleased to hear from other colleagues about how they have approached and tackled the problem. Perhaps Rob Davidson can start.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Community Wealth Building

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Matthew Brown, do you have an interesting experience to share on this issue?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Donald, did your organisation know that that type of expenditure had to be approved by the Scottish Government? After all, it was more than ÂŁ20,000.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you.

My last question on this is for Roy Brannen. As you know, the committee has over the years engaged on sponsorship issues with regard to the sponsor team, its relationships with public bodies and so on. This hardly stands out as a great example of a successful relationship in that respect, and there are issues that we have come up against time and again. What would you say to the committee and to the public about the nature of that relationship, particularly between you and the body in question? What lessons are being learned about how things have to improve in the future, so that we as an audit committee are not continuing to pick out these problems year after year?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2023”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

On performance, I spoke to NHS Ayrshire and Arran’s chief executive only last week about the specific 31-day target for cancer treatment. She said that the board continues to meet the 95 per cent level, and that it actually reached 100 per cent in November. I do not know whether there is a little discrepancy in the data-gathering period for your report, Auditor General, but that was what she clearly said to me last week.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you, convener, and good morning, colleagues.

This meeting is not particularly pleasant. I have been a member of the Parliament—and of the Public Audit Committee, on and off—for 17 years now, and I have to be honest with you and say that this is one of the worst sessions that I have ever participated in.

I have a few questions that I would like to ask Mr Rathjen. On whether the expense was retrospectively approved, you said that, ultimately, it did not make a difference, because it had already been incurred. Why would you do that? Why would you not state your case and say that it was unapproved? You cannot approve something that is clearly not approvable, if you understand my meaning. Why did you not do that? Ultimately, the public would like to know what the difference is between approving something and not approving it. If there is no difference in outcome, what is the point?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

I will come to the audit in a minute, but what would have happened in Government if you had not approved it? Surely there would be a difference between approving it and not approving it.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Turning to the issue of audit, I note that the issue was picked up by an auditor, but I am not sure whether that was an internal or external audit. Can somebody clarify whether an external or internal auditor picked up this issue?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Why was it not picked up by the internal audit team? Is there an internal audit team?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Willie Coffey

Did declaring it as an options appraisal somehow give some comfort with regard to making that decision and not seeking approval? It is clearly not a tender process—an options appraisal is not a tender process. Who introduced the notion that it was an options appraisal process and therefore did not need Scottish Government approval?