łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2341 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

National Strategy for Economic Transformation

Meeting date: 9 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Project gigabit has been around for a wee while—it is not yesterday’s news—so I would have expected a part of those consequentials to have arrived on our doorstep by this time. I would appreciate it if you could update the committee if and when that happens.

Gregor, on the reporting and evaluation side of things, you said in your opening remarks that you were refreshing and reviewing quite a number of these things. While colleagues have been chatting, I have been having a look at the NSET annual progress report from last June, in which the Auditor General’s briefing highlights that there is

“a lack of detail on when actions are expected to be delivered”.

I can see that—the NSET report from last June is full of things called “Ambition indicators”. That is another bit of jargon for committee members. It is not clear to committee members—or, perhaps, anyone else—what is meant by that, or what the outcomes of some of the actions have been.

You have spent a little bit of time telling us about some of the positive deliverables that there have been, but why are we not beginning to see those things in a formal report such as the NSET progress report, so that we can clearly see the outcomes, the benefits and so forth? Could you comment generally on whether that style and nature of reporting and evaluation is clear enough for everyone to understand?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Are developers expecting these additional components—let us call them—to be funded differently and separately by somebody else, not them, even though they are including them in their proposals?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

That is really helpful. I will turn to planning for housing and the much-talked-about minimum all-tenure housing land requirement. What are your views on the MATHLR proposals? Are they sufficient, acceptable, useful or otherwise?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Good morning, everybody.

I want to go back briefly to Ailsa Macfarlane’s comments about windows and conservation area status. I think that we will be looking at the issue later, but, Ailsa, did you say that conservation areas are excluded from that relaxation in PDRs?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

I was just about to come on to that issue. I am trying to stay out of areas that other colleagues will ask about, but on that issue of 20-minute neighbourhoods and developer proposals, are you hearing that the developers are having difficulty defining and articulating what they mean and what they are planning in order to line up with NPF4? Are you hearing that local authorities might have a different interpretation of what is meant? Is that one of the reasons that, as Catriona Hill mentioned, things are slowing down a little?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Okay. Are there any other comments?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

I want to switch the discussion to 20-minute neighbourhoods and local living. We had a good discussion with the previous panel about how well everyone is embracing those concepts, but I would like to hear your views on whether builders, developers and communities are getting close to achieving them.

Having listened to the previous comments, I note that Lugton, a small village in my constituency with a population of about 80, is incredibly rural but is only 15 miles from Glasgow and about 10 miles from Kilmarnock, so there is a contradiction in relation to whether it is, in fact, rural because it is so close to the biggest city in Scotland.

The concept of 20-minute neighbourhoods is bound to mean different things in different places. Is NPF4 flexible enough to recognise that, so that the concept can be applied properly locally? What is your perspective on whether the three groups that I mentioned are embracing the concept of 20-minute neighbourhoods? Are we beginning to see signs that it is working for us?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Donna Young, do you have any comments on the MATHLR?

11:15  

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Okay—thanks for that.

We are now a year into NPF4. I realise that it is still early days in what might be a long journey, but are you picking up any change in developers’ proposals to reflect the principles behind NPF4? Are you seeing any evidence of that? Craig McLaren mentioned the Fife document, but that is really a guidance document for local development planning. What about developers themselves? Are you getting any sense of proposals beginning to change to align with the principles behind NPF4?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4 (Annual Review)

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Willie Coffey

Can colleagues share any other experiences of developers’ proposals beginning to line up—or not?