The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Willie Coffey
Are we talking about hundreds or thousands of cases per year?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
People in Ayrshire, along with people from further afield, want to see more flights operating from Prestwick. I use the airport as regularly as I can—once a year. I support the airport. I always have done and I always will do. People always ask me, “Why aren’t there more flights coming to the airport?” The management team can decide whether to pursue that.
There was also talk about developing the old part of the airport, which I had the pleasure of visiting—it was like walking back into the 1960s. There was a plan to develop that as a big hotel to service the economy and so on, but that never materialised. Is that the kind of thing that has been hampered by simply getting the airport back on to the profitability scale? Looking to the future, could such developments take place with a new buyer? Would the Government have a view on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Gregor Irwin and colleagues. I want to ask about particular investments of the Scottish Government. You have mentioned Prestwick, and I am an Ayrshire MSP. I am delighted at the intervention that took place 11 years ago to recognise the strategic importance of Ayrshire, and it is great to see the airport returning to profitability, with more routes and so on. As was stated at the outset, however, the intention was to return the airport to the private sector—and that could perhaps also apply to the other investments that we have made when the time is most appropriate.
Could you give us a little flavour of the policy intention behind something like that—driving the business back towards profitability? Is there a tension in doing that for its own sake rather than to address the demands of the local economy? We want to return the airport to the private sector, and that has clearly led to a number of actions over those 11 years that have made the airport profitable. What is the balance between getting the airport ready for returning to the private sector and the operational nature of the airport and what it can and should be in the future?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
Not this committee.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
I thank you for those reassuring words.
In general, how are the public assured that the continuing investment by the Scottish Government in all the assets provides value for money? We will continue to retain and invest in the assets, to keep them operating. Prestwick is profitable, but how does the public get the assurance that the money that we spend on all the assets that we have invested in will deliver value for money in the years to come, before we can think about returning perhaps all of them to private ownership?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
I am probably talking too much about Prestwick, but the need to look beyond the current situation applies to the other investments, too. Given that buyers could potentially come in for any of the assets that we are talking about, does the Government retain a view of what those assets should be and how they should develop in the future? The minute that we hand over an asset to a private owner, they become the owner of that asset and it could change completely. If the Government were to hand an asset over to the private sector, what guarantees or assurances would it seek in order to protect and preserve what has been delivered locally for the economy?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
How would the Government assure the Ayrshire public, for example, that, following any future sale of Prestwick, it would continue as an airport with passenger aircraft traffic and those kinds of services? Any new buyer might wish to take it in a different direction. Would the Government have a say in guaranteeing that operational capability in any future sale?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much for your answers.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Willie Coffey
Very diplomatically answered—thanks very much for that.
Can I ask you about the different banding arrangements that we see in Scotland? Council leaders in Glasgow or Edinburgh, for example, potentially earn up to ÂŁ20,000 more than council leaders in other authorities. From my experience as a local councillor for many years, there is the same number of hours in every day and every week, and I certainly know council leaders and civic heads who spend all their time on their civic duties, and that is the case in both smaller and bigger authorities. Why is that difference there and how is it justified?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Willie Coffey
Does Steve Heddle have a view on that—particularly the recommendation to replace the four bands with three bands? I think that that would mean moving those in the first band into the second band, if you understand my meaning. What is COSLA’s view on the banding arrangement? Do you support the move to have three bands?