The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Willie Coffey
Is there no idea at the moment? Does the Government—and perhaps even the college network—not know what is required?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Willie Coffey
That sounds really encouraging, but, given those impacts, do you still think that we will achieve the required ramping up? On the evidence base, for example, it would be crucial for people to be able to speak to others who have made the change and ask them how much it costs them per month. That is key for me, as is having bigger incentives. I am afraid that there would have to be greater incentives for people to make the switch so that it makes it worth their while to do so. Along with that evidence base, Professor Bell, that might be the key to changing attitudes. Would you agree?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I will stick with the issue of who pays, which is certainly confusing me this morning.
I have always understood that pay for our local councillors is part of the overall settlement for local government, and you have said that. There seems to be a developing suggestion that somehow the Government should separate that out. I am certainly getting that sense; I do not know whether our colleagues have got that, this morning. However, when we asked our witnesses earlier whether that is what they are asking for, I think that they did not agree with that. Where does the question, “Who pays?” come from. You said yourself a wee moment ago that the difficulty is who pays. Could you explain to us again who pays the salaries of local councillors?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
That takes into account a possible backdate to—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
Was there some discussion leading up to the Verity house agreement to get the issue embedded in that agreement? Was it rejected? Did you propose that? How did things end up? Is it just not there at all and it remains a wish that it should be part of the Verity house agreement?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
To finish off on that point, are you saying that funding for local councillors should be a specifically set item in any future Scottish Government budget, that it should be specifically separate and that provision should be made for it? From my understanding, it is part of the overall settlement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
I turn to the debate about whether the proposal is a salary increase.
Angela Leitch, you said that this is not a pay increase but is a reassessment. From the figures that we have, it amounts to a potential 15 per cent increase—or reassessment. Can you explain your thinking? Why do you describe it as a reassessment and not a pay increase if it amounts to 15 per cent?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
My final question is for Jane O’Donnell. I think that you said that you hoped that, when the issue is settled, it could be backdated to 2023-24. I think that councillors are worth every penny that they get—I served myself for about 20 years in East Ayrshire—but what would the overall cost of that backdating be, if we could afford it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
If the Government agrees and sets regulations for salary levels, will it be the case that they must apply across the board in Scotland? Is the Government saying that councils “can” apply salary uplifts, or “must” apply them?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Willie Coffey
I am just trying to remember what Jane O’Donnell from COSLA said a while ago. We can check the Official Report, but she said something like, if the Scottish Government does not agree to pay, COSLA might not be able to implement the pay changes. On the one hand, you are agreeing that regulations can set the new pay levels for the councillors. On the other hand, you are saying that they might—