The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
What about the wider position on a public-facing accreditation framework?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I would like to ask a few questions about the attitudes of employers and staff to the issues that we are discussing.
Firstly, are you getting a sense, or did the researchers get a sense, that Scottish employers are engaging with the principle of fair work much more these days? Is the engagement accelerating? Is there quite broad participation? Did the researchers ask that?
10:45Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Is it the case that they have to follow these principles, or do they want to follow them? What is your sense of employers’ participation in fair work? Do they feel as though they are being dragged into it, or are they willingly engaging with it? Do we know?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Are the staff saying what they are seeing or are the employers saying it about themselves?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
You captured the fact that stress-related absence, which is a statutory indicator that has to be reported, has more than doubled. At least you have got that.
I have a final question around widening this out. Might employers be interested in establishing some kind of fair work accreditation scheme, either by self-assessment or otherwise, so that they could show their staff and people who may wish to work for them that they are a fair work employer? Is it worth reaching out to that wider sector of employers that we were talking about a wee minute ago?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
The principles talk about things such as dignified treatment and wellbeing. If the framework uses those terms, it seems to me that you should try to assess those and ask staff what they think about them, to gather that data. Otherwise, what is the point of having them in the key principles in the first place?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Willie Coffey
As I was saying, the checks and balances issue that you have all mentioned is probably the key to protecting against those outcomes. We will all agree that the principle of devolving as much power as we can is sound, but that the checks and balances—such as we have in Scotland, with the Accounts Commission and internal audit—seem, for some reason that we do not know, to have deserted our colleagues in places such as Woking in quite a stark manner. Is that a positive note on which to finish our conversation?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Are you saying that Scottish councils should have the powers that Woking Borough Council had?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Willie Coffey
I suppose that the checks and balances are probably the key to it—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Willie Coffey
I want to turn back briefly to the issue of financial sustainability to try to compare and contrast what happened in England with what could—if it were possible—happen in Scotland. We have already referred to some of the reckless behaviours down south that led to the situation there, but do you think that that recklessness came about as a result of the general power of competence being granted to England’s local authorities? I know that we do not have that power in Scotland—I am going to ask you in a minute whether you think that we should—but do you think that the situation came about as a result of councils investing in the private sector and so on and running up huge debts? We heard some spectacular examples last week of how badly it all went, but what caused it? Was it the devolution of the general power of competence?