The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Willie Coffey
Thanks for that extra information. Is it not the same for everybody, though? If someone is unhappy with an outcome, they could press the button and go down the legal route and so on. What distinguishes the experience that carers might have as opposed to anyone else who raises a complaint and is unhappy with the outcome?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Willie Coffey
Thanks for that. I am sure that the committee will be keen to take that on board as we do more work on the issue.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Willie Coffey
I want to go back to Fiona Collie, who talked about unpaid carers in answer to my first question. In your submission, you tell us that unpaid carers do not really have any meaningful access to resolution or redress through the ombudsman. Have I understood that correctly? For the benefit of the committee and the public, what is the position? If people feel that they need to raise an issue and take it to the ombudsman, do they have access?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Willie Coffey
I was on the marches at Gartcosh and Ravenscraig and the outcome was what we expected, wasn鈥檛 it?
I will focus on the transition. If we, in 2024, are on a pathway to a just transition, is it not fair, right and just that that transition completes at Grangemouth? That is why I was emphasising the point about refining continuing. If production capacity is just moved away from Grangemouth, that is hardly a just transition. If we reach a point at which society does not need 54 million barrels of oil a year, the transition will be complete, but Grangemouth should be involved in that process until we reach that point.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you. I wish you well.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Derek鈥攜ou are doing an absolutely magnificent job of explaining to the public in Scotland why the plant shouldnae shut and why it should continue. It all sounds to me like a rerun of the Gartcosh story in 1986 and the Ravenscraig story in 1992, in which a major strategic industry is removed from Scotland.
The explanations given now are basically the same as they were then, but this time the net zero transition is being held up as the main reason for this. Can you clarify where the refining capability will go during the transition? It is not stopping altogether. I imagine that it is being transferred elsewhere. Grangemouth could do 150,000 barrels a day, which is 54 million barrels a year. That demand will not just suddenly stop. Is that refining capability being transferred elsewhere during this so-called transition process? If that is the case, it is not a transition, it is an asset-stripping closure, is it not?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Willie Coffey
I understand that the data that informs the implementation update report, which came out in August, goes up to the end of 2023, and that the report does not include the data from January 2024 to August 2024. Is there any reason why the data for that section of the current year was not included? We want the information to be as up to date and current as possible.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Willie Coffey
Lorna Johnston, I want to ask you a bit more about potential emerging trends in the complaints process. Ian Bruce talked earlier about social media being one area where we are seeing a rise in complaints, and that their nature is more personal, with, for example, personal attacks and councillor-on-councillor complaints. Will you expand on that for the committee and explain what the emerging trends are in the whole complaints process or in the complaints domain?
10:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Willie Coffey
I turn to training. Is training on the code of conduct for councils mandatory, or is it optional and they can choose not to participate in any such training?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you for your opening remarks, Ian. My question is in the same area. Why do so many councillors complain about one another? When might you expect to see the fruits of the guidance being embraced and adopted by our local authority councillors? Will you also say a bit about whether awareness of conduct issues rather than performance issues, as you described, is a mandatory part of councillor training? Will you give us a little flavour of that to widen the discussion a bit?