The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Willie Coffey
Okay, thank you for that. I will come to project gigabit in a wee minute.
The areas that the R100 programme cannot reach鈥攙ery rural locations, single properties and so on鈥攔ely on the voucher scheme for access. However, I am worried by the number of inquiries that I still get from people who live remotely and cannot access mainstream R100, so to speak. They include people in East Ayrshire, for example, who rely on the voucher scheme. Does the Government think that a subsidy of 拢5,000 is enough to enable single-property outliers, for example, to get connected? I am sure that other members get inquiries from people in the more rural parts of their constituencies on whether they can access superfast broadband in that way. I would like to hear your views on whether the Government thinks that the voucher scheme is still delivering what was intended.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, convener and good morning, Deputy First Minister and colleagues.
I have a couple of questions about the reaching 100 per cent programme and another about city and region growth deals. R100 has been a hugely successful programme that the Government introduced in 2017, I think, to try to get 100 per cent of properties in Scotland on broadband digital connectivity. I note that the connectivity element of the spend profile falls off slightly to 拢33 million. Is that an indication that the Government thinks that we are nearing the end of the requirement for connectivity spend for the R100 programme?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Willie Coffey
Would we, in this committee or in other committees of the Parliament, be able to see something like that a couple of times a year, perhaps, so that we can see how progress has been made and give the deals democratic accountability? There is substantial investment by the Scottish Government鈥攖he Ayrshire growth deal, for example, is worth 拢100 million鈥攂ut there is no formal scrutiny process in Parliament for it, that I am aware of, and I would certainly value one.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Is the balance right though? Why would Co-operatives UK tell us that the flexibility is not there and then you tell us the opposite? Why would it say that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much for that.
My other question was on interventions and their costs. We had some evidence about the extremely high cost of some interventions鈥攚itnesses told us that the Reidvale intervention cost 拢0.5 million and the Wishaw one cost 拢400,000. The discussion that the committee then had was about value for money and justification for such high levels of cost, and about whether those costs are capped and, ultimately, who pays for the intervention that is passed on to tenants. I would like to get your thoughts on the intervention process and whether any careful scrutiny and monitoring need to take place of whether the public is getting value for money from those high costs.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that clarification. Is it the regulator鈥檚 view that that money was well spent and that the outcomes for tenants were positive enough?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
I invite you to say a few words about compliance, which is another issue that has been brought to the committee In its evidence, Co-operatives UK told us that it thought that the regulator focuses a bit too much on compliance, to the exclusion of, let us say, enabling and facilitating innovation. It pointed to differences between the regulatory framework as it applies to bigger associations and to smaller ones, and asked, I suppose, whether one size fits all. What are your views on that? Is the compliance regulatory framework flexible enough to allow development, growth and innovation to take place?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
It said, for example, that housing co-ops are a different model from other housing management systems, and that smaller associations sometimes feel overburdened by the regulatory framework that impacts on them, whereas larger organisations can cope pretty well.
I suppose that the question for you is whether you apply flexibility in how you deal with smaller housing co-ops, for example, rather than just imposing on them the regulatory framework that must be obeyed. That is really where we are. They felt that there was a lack of flexibility on your part in dealing with them.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Would you say that cost of the two that I mentioned鈥攏early 拢1 million鈥攚as money well spent and that the outcomes were positive for tenants?
10:45