The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
You mentioned banding systems. The Welsh added another band—band I. We made a valiant attempt to adjust the multipliers on the upper four bands. Do you still see a banding system as being the cornerstone and at the heart of the process, or is that up for debate and discussion?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Turning to revaluation and whether it can be a tool to make the system fairer, the Scottish Government’s “Framework for Tax” document, which came out in 2021, had the broad principle that
“Taxes should be levied in proportion to taxpayers’ ability to pay.”
We know that, but does the Government still ascribe to trying to embed that vision at the heart of any new system, and how can we use the tool of revaluation to deliver that fairness?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning, cabinet secretary, Councillor Hagmann and colleagues. I first want to ask Councillor Hagmann about the convention that is planned for March. It would be fair to say that our committee thinks that the best that we can possibly achieve is some kind of agreement on broad principles to take us forward, and you mentioned that that might be the purpose of the convention in March. Has that been rolled out to all the participating political parties to get them to think about what consensus might look like so that we can move forward?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Thanks for that.
I have a final point. You probably heard everyone at a previous meeting of the committee saying that revaluation must happen, because the system involves 1991 values and so on. Should that necessarily happen on its own if we cannot get agreement on a replacement council tax system, or does it need to be meshed together?
10:30Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Councillor Hagmann, if all we get out of this is a revaluation process, would that be worth while?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Does the new deal open the door to allow that? The purpose and the intention is to embrace collaboration and working together. Is it not doing that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Does the national strategy for economic transformation get us into that space, or could we do more to—
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Should the new deal model offer such engagement and act as an interface?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Willie Coffey
I put the same question to Karen Meechan. How do we get the structural interface working better so that it delivers what your sectors need?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Luke, what is your perspective on how that relationship can be improved?