˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2341 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

I have a question about the online portal that the Auditor General mentioned earlier. In the Public Audit Committee, we usually receive the opposite type of reports about information and communication technology initiatives, but the online portal for PPE ordering seems to have been a success. Do you have any information on who developed it? Is it still in place and working well?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

That is great. Thank you.

Public Audit Committee

“Covid-19 vaccination programme”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

I have just a few, convener.

Were lower rates of vaccination among certain age groups and certain communities attributable to digital access issues, or are there different reasons for lower numbers of people in those age groups and communities coming forward for vaccination?

Public Audit Committee

“Covid-19 vaccination programme”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

I have a query about the compatibility of our digital platforms with other jurisdictions’ systems. We have heard stories from here, there and everywhere that when people have moved from country to country the digital apps are not compatible. Are we largely ironing that out, or are there still issues to resolve?

Public Audit Committee

“Community justice: Sustainable alternatives to custody”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

Are those barriers preventing us from imposing community-based sentences and forcing us to have custodial sentences?

Public Audit Committee

“Community justice: Sustainable alternatives to custody”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

From our perspective, or from the public’s perspective, although there is evidence that people who are given short sentences are twice as likely to be reconvicted, that does not seem to be reflected in the number of community disposals that are being given. Is there an imbalance that should be explored further with the judiciary?

Public Audit Committee

“Covid-19 vaccination programme”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

You have said that the digital apps work really well and had to be developed at pace. Members of the public always ask me where the data is kept. Sometimes, I ask general practices questions about constituents and issues. Where is the data? Who keeps it and who makes it secure?

Public Audit Committee

“Community justice: Sustainable alternatives to custody”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I want to start the discussion about the judiciary’s response to the whole situation by asking whether you think that they are keeping pace with the changes that are occurring. From the data that we have, it seems that someone who has previously had a custodial sentence is twice as likely to be reconvicted as someone who has had a community disposal. That is not reflected in the numbers and percentages of community disposals that we are seeing. Therefore, the question that we are interested in is whether the judiciary are keeping pace with the changes.

In this morning’s press release from the Scottish Sentencing Council, Lady Dorrian cites a number of key themes, including greater consistency and resource constraints. She also talks about legislative barriers and, importantly, the public’s perception, which is that there is a problem with confidence in community disposals. What do you think that the potential barriers might be to the judiciary catching up with the process?

09:15  

Public Audit Committee

“Community justice: Sustainable alternatives to custody”

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Willie Coffey

Lady Dorrian has referred to legislative barriers to the imposition of community-based sentences. The legislation is there. Where are the barriers?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 October 2021

Willie Coffey

Thank you, convener, and good morning, panel. I hope that you can hear me okay, as I have had to switch devices during this evidence session to be able to connect with you. Do the panel members think that the MCC process in general gives us the most effective mechanism to target the support that is needed? We heard just a minute ago from Stuart Mackinnon that only a fifth of small businesses appeal their valuations. I am aware that, back in March, the UK Government announced a £1.5 billion relief scheme that it says will enable local government to target properly the small businesses and other businesses that need the most support. I do not think that that money has been made available yet, but do the witnesses think that that approach is better than the broader MCC appeal process? I ask Stuart Mackinnon to answer that first.