³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 27 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2341 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802â€

Meeting date: 21 April 2022

Willie Coffey

Did you investigate why that guarantee was withdrawn within a month, or did the parties just proceed to make the best of the circumstances in which they found themselves?

Public Audit Committee

“Drug and alcohol services: An updateâ€

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

You also note that there are a number of competing projects locally. I am sure that there are projects in all members’ constituencies that are competing for support and funding to tackle these issues. To what extent is that a problem that is preventing us from getting to where we need to be? I encounter it quite a lot in my area; groups are almost arguing with one another that they should be receiving financial support to deliver these services. There does not seem to be any clear way through this in relation to who delivers the best solution on the ground.

Public Audit Committee

“Drug and alcohol services: An updateâ€

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

Yes—we will probably follow that up. Thanks very much to both of you.

Public Audit Committee

Major Information and Communications Technology Projects (Accountability and Governance)

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you very much for that. Back to you, convener.

Public Audit Committee

Major Information and Communications Technology Projects (Accountability and Governance)

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

I heard clearly and really appreciated those good, lengthy and detailed answers. I will not pick out individual projects—I think that Craig Hoy might refer to a few key ones later on—but going back to Geoff Huggins’s comments on the benefits of good design, I would suggest that, if you have good design and a clear specification for a piece of software, you are in with a good chance of delivering on time and on budget. Is that not the case? Are you able to assure the committee that we are in a good place with the range of projects that are being worked on—a figure of more than 500 was mentioned—and that we know that the design, specifications and skills mix are good enough to deliver those projects on time and on budget? In short, are all the projects that are on our books well defined and capable of being delivered on time and on budget?

Public Audit Committee

Major Information and Communications Technology Projects (Accountability and Governance)

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

Can you assure us that we are not likely to see another i6 project any time soon?

Public Audit Committee

Major Information and Communications Technology Projects (Accountability and Governance)

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

That would have to happen during a discussion about ICT, wouldn’t it, convener? [Laughter.]

Public Audit Committee

Major Information and Communications Technology Projects (Accountability and Governance)

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, panel. I want to ask a couple of questions on progress with the technical assurance framework.

The witnesses are bound to recall the factors and key reasons for ICT projects failing in the past: project planning, the lack of application of quality-management processes and skills identification. Indeed, skills problems and the skills mix have always been problems. The committee felt that there were a number of issues that, over the years, have led to projects running over time and over budget. The i6 project, for example, was particularly bad in that respect. We saw how things tended to be rushed from the start, how projects were poorly defined and how too many changes were made along the way, all of which led to overruns. As I recall, the i6 project itself was abandoned altogether.

I wonder whether Geoff Huggins and Donny McGillivray can give us an overview of where we are now with all those issues. Have we captured the problems? Are the processes that we embraced and the various other frameworks in place and working towards successful delivery?

Public Audit Committee

“Drug and alcohol services: An updateâ€

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

You also note that the Government has not been particularly clear on the level of spending that is being targeted at early intervention and prevention. Can you say a few words about that? What should the Government be doing to clarify or improve that aspect?

Public Audit Committee

“Drug and alcohol services: An updateâ€

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Willie Coffey

That is a really important point. I know from local experience that, during Covid in particular, when people were coming out of the criminal justice system, they were finding it difficult to access support services. If we can do anything to reinstate and recover that aspect of the service, that would contribute, at least in part, to turning things around.

My last question is about the governance aspect. Your report reminds us that

“The Scottish Government and COSLA agreed eight recommendations to improve the governance and accountabilityâ€

of various services, leading to the development of the partnership delivery framework for alcohol and drug partnerships. Could you say a wee bit more about how that has been progressing, please?