łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 30 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2149 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Willie Coffey

That is very helpful and reassuring.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Willie Coffey

Are there any new lessons to be learned from the accelerated process of disbursing public funds and safeguarding them for the future? Are there any lessons that we can learn that would offer us more protection?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

That was really thorough. Thank you. I am sure that my committee colleagues will pick out some of those items as the meeting goes on.

For my second question, I will pick out one issue. I have previously raised the issue of derelict shops, buildings and land, which you mentioned. Will NPF4 give local authorities more powers to deal with that? The breadth of NPF4 looks great—there are a lot of good things in there. However, what I see now as a local member and what I saw as a councillor for many years is derelict and abandoned shops, buildings and pieces of land, which local authorities have limited powers to effect change on—by serving amenity notices and so on—so that the environment is improved, particularly in our towns. Will the framework strengthen powers or provide additional powers that can contribute to the overall look and feel that our towns and villages might need to support them?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you. I can follow up on that, but I will allow other members to come in now, convener.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning to both witnesses. I have a broader question. NPF4 will replace the document “Scottish Planning Policy”, and future frameworks will be a formal part of every local development plan. Fiona Simpson, what are the more significant changes that you hope the approach will make? Are local authorities okay with that? Do they see the approach as an imposition on local flexibility and so on?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you for that, and thank you convener.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

I have been looking at the section in the NPF on central urban transformation action areas, in the context of the issue that I asked about earlier. The policy seems to be aimed at major

“disused sites, and areas that have been blighted by dereliction”.

I suppose that that means areas that are blighted by opencast mining and stuff like that. However, I was talking about our high streets and the blight of empty, abandoned and filthy shops that have trees and bushes growing out of them. I was thinking about the bits of abandoned land that we see in the urban envelope.

Am I barking up the wrong tree? Are powers to address such issues best left to other planning and enforcement policies, or can we reach out and tackle the issue through the proposals in the framework?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

It does, a wee bit. I am sure that other members are seeing loads of empty shops being left to rot in town centre high streets. On a number of occasions, I have tried to get the owners or the agents to do something about such places—even just to clean them. Simple requests to clean up buildings and make them look a bit more appealing often fall on deaf ears because it all comes down to cost, eventually. The document contains noble aims about future proofing and reinventing our city centres, but how do we bridge that gap when some owners or agents refuse even to clean up a building or shop and get rid of the graffiti from the windows? How on earth do we achieve that? Is the NPF the right place for us to attempt it?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 18 January 2022

Willie Coffey

If a local authority serves an amenity notice on an owner or an agent of a shop or a building, and it is not carried out, actioned, challenged or whatever, does the burden then fall on the local authority to complete the action? I have heard that that might be the case. Perhaps that is why so few amenity notices are served. Is that case?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Bòrd na Gàidhlig”

Meeting date: 13 January 2022

Willie Coffey

Auditor General, you might remember from the evidence session with our predecessor committee that the director general for education, communities and justice said that there might be greater

“scope for the Government to ... engage more”

directly with the Gaelic community

“to gauge their views on”—[Official Report, Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee, 4 March 2021; c 11.]

the board and their relationship with it. Did that happen? Has that been picked up naturally as a result of the work in the action plan that the board has recently been working through?