The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2149 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Willie Coffey
That is very helpful and reassuring.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Are there any new lessons to be learned from the accelerated process of disbursing public funds and safeguarding them for the future? Are there any lessons that we can learn that would offer us more protection?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
That was really thorough. Thank you. I am sure that my committee colleagues will pick out some of those items as the meeting goes on.
For my second question, I will pick out one issue. I have previously raised the issue of derelict shops, buildings and land, which you mentioned. Will NPF4 give local authorities more powers to deal with that? The breadth of NPF4 looks great—there are a lot of good things in there. However, what I see now as a local member and what I saw as a councillor for many years is derelict and abandoned shops, buildings and pieces of land, which local authorities have limited powers to effect change on—by serving amenity notices and so on—so that the environment is improved, particularly in our towns. Will the framework strengthen powers or provide additional powers that can contribute to the overall look and feel that our towns and villages might need to support them?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. I can follow up on that, but I will allow other members to come in now, convener.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning to both witnesses. I have a broader question. NPF4 will replace the document “Scottish Planning Policy”, and future frameworks will be a formal part of every local development plan. Fiona Simpson, what are the more significant changes that you hope the approach will make? Are local authorities okay with that? Do they see the approach as an imposition on local flexibility and so on?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that, and thank you convener.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
I have been looking at the section in the NPF on central urban transformation action areas, in the context of the issue that I asked about earlier. The policy seems to be aimed at major
“disused sites, and areas that have been blighted by dereliction”.
I suppose that that means areas that are blighted by opencast mining and stuff like that. However, I was talking about our high streets and the blight of empty, abandoned and filthy shops that have trees and bushes growing out of them. I was thinking about the bits of abandoned land that we see in the urban envelope.
Am I barking up the wrong tree? Are powers to address such issues best left to other planning and enforcement policies, or can we reach out and tackle the issue through the proposals in the framework?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
It does, a wee bit. I am sure that other members are seeing loads of empty shops being left to rot in town centre high streets. On a number of occasions, I have tried to get the owners or the agents to do something about such places—even just to clean them. Simple requests to clean up buildings and make them look a bit more appealing often fall on deaf ears because it all comes down to cost, eventually. The document contains noble aims about future proofing and reinventing our city centres, but how do we bridge that gap when some owners or agents refuse even to clean up a building or shop and get rid of the graffiti from the windows? How on earth do we achieve that? Is the NPF the right place for us to attempt it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Willie Coffey
If a local authority serves an amenity notice on an owner or an agent of a shop or a building, and it is not carried out, actioned, challenged or whatever, does the burden then fall on the local authority to complete the action? I have heard that that might be the case. Perhaps that is why so few amenity notices are served. Is that case?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Auditor General, you might remember from the evidence session with our predecessor committee that the director general for education, communities and justice said that there might be greater
“scope for the Government to ... engage more”
directly with the Gaelic community
“to gauge their views on”—[Official Report, Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee, 4 March 2021; c 11.]
the board and their relationship with it. Did that happen? Has that been picked up naturally as a result of the work in the action plan that the board has recently been working through?