The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Can we just wait a minute until the helicopter passes over? [Interruption.]
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
On the broader issue of quality and quality standards, there is also commentary in the Auditor General’s report about there being little or no linkage to quality standards and no linkage between milestone events and quality checks. There is a comment that the quality was initially good but that, from October 2017-ish, he was beginning to highlight many quality issues, and those led to the owner observation reports, which were many and numerous. Can you say something about the application of quality standards and whether you considered it was correct, appropriate, fit for purpose and so on, or whether it was not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
In any process of constructing anything, you are bound to get comments and requests for change—specification changes, perhaps—as you go along. Is that natural in the process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
The documentation that we have says that there were 346 observation reports.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
They are a commentary about the construction that is going on during the process.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you, convener. I just want to get in my parochial question. Bill, when can we expect the electrification to extend from Barrhead to Kilmarnock, in my constituency?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning. It is fair to say that this committee has been keenly focused on the capital projects report from year to year. Our approach has probably changed over the years with regard to how we ask questions in relation to that, but what has probably been a constant is a focus on projects that are delayed, overrunning and over budget. That is the first thing that jumps out at committee members, so that is still there. From my perspective, I am always interested in how we apply standards to the construction of anything, whether it is roads, bridges, schools or even ferries. In broad terms, in the suite of projects that are under way, are recognised quality management construction standards being applied across the board? Are we able to see that in a simple form that would assure the committee that that is taking place?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Has that been put to the Government? Do you expect to see that when the Government finalises its report and assessment of Covid support spending?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Could you talk to us a wee bit more about the systems development aspect of this? You will recall—and members will recall—that, at the outset of this project, which was in the previous session of Parliament, there were some concerns about the software systems development side of it, because of our previous experiences. It is fair to say that this project has gone particularly well. The Agile methodology has been deployed. Although it was deployed in another area that you mentioned and was not so successful, this one has gone very well. It is so complex. Can you unpick why this particular methodology and this particular project have gone so well compared to predecessors that we have other experience of?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Willie Coffey
It is good practice for software development and software engineering to deliver what the client actually wants, and no more. It is a crucial feature of Agile that you do not do more than you need to.
Stephen Boyle, you have mentioned a few times that there are trade-offs with that particular methodology, so there may be parts of the system development that have been set aside. Will we ever need to implement them? Are the solutions that we are getting now likely to be permanent solutions or will we keep having to backtrack and improve and develop and so on and so forth as the project develops?