łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2292 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Will you reflect on what happens next? We have heard that the report will be finalised in April. We have also heard that, even at this point, quite a lot of SMEs have not heard of the new deal. I am sure that that is the case in your constituency and in mine. How can we get them to feel part of and participate in the new deal going forward? Where do we go next? Will there be a new deal 2 coming down the track?

11:00  

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Finally, Kate Forbes, are you confident that it is a genuine two-way relationship? You spoke quite positively about businesses’ asks being reflected back in policy development. Are you quite confident that that will develop and grow, and that we will see more of that as a result of this engagement process through the new deal?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Dr Malik, how do we permeate the principles that are in the new deal so that a wider number of small businesses in all our constituencies can participate in it?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Many thanks for that. I realise that I am probably encroaching on my colleagues’ questions, which will give you a chance to develop that theme.

I would like to get a sense of what the other witnesses think. Do we need to do something at the front end of the letting process of a tenancy, so that tenants can be assured that the house they get does not have damp and mould present? Would that be a good idea?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Thanks, convener. Building maintenance has been an issue for years. Suddenly, we discover that there is RAAC and there is a problem to be addressed. Have we collectively taken our eye off the ball with that issue? Scotland is a wet country. It rains 200 days a year, so it should not come as a surprise that the buildings get wet from time to time. Why should it have come as a surprise that we get these issues with RAAC? Should we have been closely examining it regularly and looking at maintenance issues? Who should have done it? Should building owners and landlords have done it? Should they continue to do it in the future?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Would standard guidance cover that? If the issues are variable wherever we see RAAC, would standard guidance work?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Thank you, convener. Good morning to you both.

I want to ask you about trust. Who can tenants who live in a house that suffers from dampness and mould trust? My experience as an elected member is littered with examples of council officials turning up and blaming tenants an their lifestyle for being the principal cause of dampness and mould in the house. That has been going on for years.

You might have heard a wee bit of the discussion with the previous witnesses about who we can trust to tell us the truth about the condition of a house. Do you have a view on that? Who should that be? Should there be an independent panel of experts, as has been mentioned, so that tenants can understand what is being said to them and can trust what is being said about repairs to their houses?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Good morning to everybody on the panel.

Thinking about the examples that people have cited just now and in previous years, is it your experience that the damp and mould are already there when people get the tenancy and do not occur after they take up the tenancy? My experience over the years, as a councillor and in the Parliament, is that the damp and mould are there in the first place. Should there be a system that assesses the fitness of the property initially, at the letting stage, in which the landlord—whoever it is—declares that the house is fit for purpose and does not have damp and mould? All the problems that we are dealing with today are there when a tenant begins living in a property.

Thinking about the example that Sean Clerkin gave of a person having lived in the property for 14 years, I would bet that the damp and mould were there in the beginning, before that person got the house. Do you think that we should look at the front end of the process and correctly assess the condition of a house at that point, to make sure that it can be let?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Are there any other views from the panel on the idea of having some kind of front-end assessment of a property’s condition?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Building Safety and Maintenance

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Willie Coffey

Are there any other comments on that?

10:00