The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Willie Coffey
The key component that is perhaps missing in the process is possibly the ability of the yard to deliver the ships. We all know that hindsight is a wonderful thing, but why would there not be in that process some kind of assessment of the yard’s ability to complete the vessels on time and on budget? That is what has happened since. Where was the assurance about the yard’s ability to complete them? Where was that in the process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Willie Coffey
I ask you to clarify that all the key players in the process were content—perhaps not happy, but content—that the risks with which we were presented were manageable. At that stage, everyone was content to make a recommendation to proceed. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Willie Coffey
Can you think of any additional process of assurance that could have taken place that might have helped us to avoid getting to where we are today? What could we possibly have done at that time to try to avoid the circumstances that we find ourselves in?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Mr Middleton. I will ask a few questions about that area as well.
Up to the point where the approval was given, there was clearly concern about the contracts, and it did not lead to anyone asking for written authority or ministerial direction, so there must have been some kind of assurance process that enabled you to recommend to ministers that they proceed with the contract. That seems to be missing for members of the committee and the public. What happened to take us from concerns to feeling able to recommend proceeding with the contract? What did the assurance process that enabled that advice to be given to the minister look like?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Derek. I want to unpick a wee bit the nature and substance of the assurance that was given to you to allow you to proceed to award the contract. Was it submissions that said, “We assure you that everything is okay, minister”, or were there technical documents in that assurance framework that contained information, technical advice and guidance, evidence and so on? What is the substance of the assurance that you read to enable you to make the award?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Willie Coffey
I asked Mr Middleton about this earlier. The key players who were involved in giving you that recommendation must have been similarly assured that what they were saying to you was delivered.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, everyone. I will pick on Mike Callaghan and Gary Fairley from COSLA to ask whether issues that East Ayrshire Council—my council—raised in its submission are shared by councils across Scotland.
One of the big messages in East Ayrshire Council’s submission is about the decision whether
“to invest in existing stock”
or in “new build”. It is clear that many councils will have to face that choice. East Ayrshire said that it is “untenable” for it to consider both strategies without an on-going assessment of the impact of borrowing and all the factors that colleagues around the table have mentioned so far. As COSLA representatives and spokespersons, do you share the view that it is in effect untenable for councils to do both?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
Willie Coffey
East Ayrshire Council also commented on grant levels. Aaron Hill mentioned the flexibility that the Scottish Government has already shown. If a council provides sufficient evidence, hopefully a grant is made, and the funding can be made available. However, East Ayrshire Council said that the process works on a site-by-site or project basis. Is there an issue there, such that we need to improve the process and make it a bit more seamless?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
Willie Coffey
I have a final query for our COSLA colleagues, if they are still online. It is reported that the UK Government might be thinking about bringing back the right to buy for housing association homes. East Ayrshire Council made a specific response to that point, saying that it could make the situation worse, especially in the current climate. Do our friends and colleagues from COSLA share that view?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. I will hand back to other colleagues.