The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much, convener.
On the issue that Sharon Dowey has just raised, it seems from the explanation that no load testing of the system was carried out in advance. It is clear that that would and should have identified that the system would think that there was a cyberattack. Why was that not done in advance?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thanks for that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
The submission says that the digital assurance office was established in 2019, but I also note that that was the last year in which a project was stopped for any reason. Has your experience since then benefited you by allowing you to identify as early as possible whether a project should or should not go forward? Are you saying that, since the DAO developed this process, every piece of work that has been undertaken has successfully gone through the various stages to completion?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that.
It is the digital assurance framework itself that gives rise to my next question. How do we make sure that we have the right people and the right balance to review a particular piece of work? Perhaps that is a question for Sharon Fairweather. Looking at the organogram that you have submitted in your letter, Sharon, I find the set of structures with regard to officers and responsibilities fairly complex. What does it mean in practice? Moreover, given what Geoff Huggins has just said, how do you choose which skills to deploy in particular reviews that you undertake?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Does that cover the software development skills and ability of the team in question, their quality management experience of the tools to be used and so on鈥攖hat is, the whole technical side鈥攁nd an appraisal of whether the team is capable of delivering to requirements?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Aye.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
My next question is on an issue that comes up regularly at committee. It appears that, when you commission of any new piece of IT software, if you get the specification, the design, the embracing of quality standards and all of that stuff right at the outset, there is a fair chance that you will get everything right. Where does that sort of thing sit within the framework, Sharon? Where is that assurance work done?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
We have not asked for this, convener, but is it possible to see an example of a staged assessment so that we can follow the process right from the beginning, when the technical appraisal of a piece of work is carried out, through the review that is undertaken to the project then being signed off? Could we see what happens at each stage?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I am not asking for anything specific. I am just wondering whether it would be possible to see that sort of thing, if one wanted to have a look at the process.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
That would be good.
Another common theme that arises at the committee is the identification of things that can be learned and the sharing of good practice. How do we capture all of that鈥攖he lessons learned and the sharing of good practice鈥攖o ensure that the best possible solutions are being deployed?
09:15