The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I am curious about that, because we talk about target rates and response rates and they are entirely different things, as we all know. The UK target was not 97 per cent; it was 94 per cent. I am curious about why we think that we are significantly above or below when we do not know what target we are trying to reach for the survey to be valid. I note that in your report, Auditor General, you say that the census target response rate for Scotland’s local authorities was 85 per cent, which was exceeded by the actual response rate. I also note, from the ONS report on the census survey that was carried out in England and Wales, that the target was 80 per cent for local authorities in England and Wales. Why was there a lower target for response rates for England and Wales compared with that of Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Auditor General, before I ask a couple of questions about the work that remains to be done and some questions on the digital aspect of the census, I would like to know whether there is a standard—an industry standard or otherwise—percentage return rate that would be required to get a representative sample of the population in something like a census? What is the percentage figure or is there none?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Willie Coffey
The point that I am trying to make is that, if a target is set lower and the response rate significantly exceeds it, it looks as though the performance is better than might otherwise have been expected. The higher that a target is set, the more difficult it is to do that.
I will move on to another question on your report. As one of your key messages, you say:
“Significant work remains to be done during 2022/23 to ensure that the census delivers robust population estimates and other outputs.”
Will you tell us a wee bit more about what that work involves?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I turn to the digital aspect of the census. Were we hampered in Scotland by the public’s access to digital devices to complete the online survey? Could you start by telling us what the difference was between this census and the previous one? There was a big digital and online component to this census, which was not the case before, so has that been a significant factor?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Yes, that is very helpful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I will ask the same question that I asked the previous panel. Councillor Morrison, you must have heard the responses from your councillor colleagues about the progress of the local governance review since 2017. The responses were hardly rosy, although there were a few glimmers of positivity near the end. How do you think that work has gone?
I might as well roll my second question into this one. Did we raise the expectations of local communities too much in relation to what the outcome of the review would be?
Can you give us, first, your perspective on how the review has gone and, secondly, your view on whether we perhaps overreached by creating expectations that were too high about what it might achieve?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
The same question goes to Cleland Sneddon. Two years’ worth of work was done between 2018 and 2019 before it was paused for a number of reasons. What is your perspective on what has come out of the review so far regarding a positive direction of travel?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Councillor Macaulay, has there been progress since the governance review was started? Could you share a few thoughts with us?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, everyone. Forgive my croaky voice this morning.
I want to take you back to the local governance review, which I understand kicked off in 2017, with most of the work being done in 2018-19. It was then paused, for obvious reasons, because of Covid. I want to get a few sentences from each of you about what you think has been achieved in the local governance review to date and whether you are satisfied with, if not the timescale of the progress, the content and delivery of what has been discussed. I will start with Councillor Ross.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Councillor Stockan, can we have a few comments about the governance review from your experience?