The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2297 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. Stephen Boyle touched on my other question, which is about the code of corporate guidance and so on, which seems to be saying the right things and clarifying roles and responsibilities. Is it a little early to form a view about its effectiveness? Is that what we mean by bedding-in time in order to have a look at it? Will someone have a wee look at it subsequently to make sure that it is working?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Willie Coffey
Stephen, could you say a bit more about the impact of all of that on the crofting community? Clearly, the commission has had to carry out a heck of an amount of work, including putting in place procedures and the code of corporate governance that you referred to, but what about the impact on crofting services as a whole? Have you any sense of the response of the crofting community to all of that and how its members feel about it?
09:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
I would like your perspective on whether the funding formula is correct and appropriate or whether it needs to be adjusted. There is a huge amount of debate about that. We have figures that show that Aberdeen City Council and City of Edinburgh Council get the smallest settlements per head in Scotland. However, if we look at the real-terms changes to the revenue allocations, we see that Aberdeen council is at the top at 7.2 per cent. I think that the Scottish average is 3 per cent.
There is a whole set of variables in the funding formula. What is your perspective on it? Are you content with it? I suppose that the answer will be no, but does the formula need to be adjusted and is it a fair way to allocate resource to Scotland’s councils?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
I want to ask each of the three witnesses for their perspectives on the use of reserves. Earlier, Bill Moyes said that two thirds of councils are planning to deploy some element of their reserves to meet requirements for the year ahead. Will you each offer a perspective on what your council is doing, as well as giving a general perspective on how you see the whole position about reserves and how they should be used and deployed in local government?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Thanks very much for that, everybody.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I want to start by asking about the much-loved subject of ring fencing. Maybe someone will write a book about ring fencing one day, so that we can all understand it.
There are several figures going around. The commission thinks that 23 per cent of local government’s revenue funding is directed or ring fenced for our shared priorities. The Scottish Government thinks that that portion is about 7 per cent, but COSLA thinks that it is 60 per cent. How have each of the parties arrived at those figures? Will you explain, in particular, how the commission arrived at its figure of 23 per cent?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
We will come to those issues in a wee while. Thank you for answering those questions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
I can remember it, Martin. Thank you for that perspective. Kirsty, do you have anything to add?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Are you happy with the funding formula that is in place?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Bill Moyes, you mentioned savings targets. According to my notes, councils achieved most of their savings targets in 2021-22. Have you assessed the impact of those savings on jobs and services? What are we looking at, going forward? In your opening remarks, you painted quite a bleak picture of the task that faces councils when it comes to the funding gaps that they must address. Councils successfully made savings in the past; how much more can they do in future?