The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2465 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much for those contributions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Not to worry—I will ask the same question of the Minister for Housing when he joins us in the next session.
I will put another point to you. We recently heard that the United Kingdom Government is thinking about proposing amendments to its housing bill—the Social Housing (Regulation) Bill—to require social landlords to investigate and fix damp and mould in their properties and to apply time limits for doing that. Is that a potential direction of travel for Scotland to look at? I will ask the housing minister that, too, when he is here, but what do you think?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Helen, what do you think of the UK Government’s potential approach to setting timescales?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Finally, a couple of weeks ago, our Living Rent colleagues suggested that a compensation element could be attached if the problem is not resolved in whatever timescale we think appropriate. Do you see that as workable, and do you support it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Good morning, minister. It is good to see you on that side of the table. You are very welcome.
You and I were local councillors for many years. One big issue that recurred year after year was dampness and mould in the various housing stocks. I will go straight to what I think is an important question to ask you. Do you think that it is now time that the Government included mould and condensation as recognised hazards as part of the statutory definition of what a tolerable standard is?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Willie Coffey
So, employers can apply the incorrect tax code to their employees and remain anonymous?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Is information on the employers involved publicly available, or is it confidential and we will never know who they are?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you. I hope that I can come back in on the S-code issue that my colleague might raise in a moment.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Willie Coffey
My last query is whether there is an overall value of the loss attached to the 41,000 people who are not paying tax under the proper Scottish tax code.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Willie Coffey
I want to probe a bit further into the number of taxpayer records that do not have the proper S code attached. Something like 41,000 were identified in March 2022, and in March 2021 it was 39,000. The percentage might go down a wee bit but the actual numbers are going up of cases where S codes are knowingly not being applied correctly. Is it an offence for an employer not to apply an S code correctly when they know that they should?