The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
It will surely have to form part of the projections if the college faces a £2 million burden up to 2025. I imagine that it will still have to be captured within this scenario as well.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Ayrshire College is the only college in Scotland that still has a live PFI liability.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
I want to follow up the questions that Colin Beattie posed about the potential for commercial income. What is the colleges’ relationship—if any—with the European Union now and what will it be going forward? Stephen Boyle will know that they used to benefit from European social fund money and so on. Was that ever replaced in any way, shape or form? What is preventing Scotland’s colleges from continuing to develop even a commercial relationship with the European Union?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
I have a final question on Ayrshire College. Auditor General, you cite the residual private finance initiative payments that the college is still making. As I understand it, it still pays £2 million a year to pay off the PFI investment from about 23 years ago. Is that still contained in the college’s financial projections? Will it be part of the forecast scenario going forward?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Auditor General. I want to open up a bit of discussion on the Ayrshire College commentary that is in your briefing. There is almost a doomsday scenario potential forecast in there that would worry everyone in the sector—it would worry everyone in Ayrshire—but the college principal has subsequently ruled that forecast out and has not adopted that forecasting. She has written to members to clarify that.
Could you give us a flavour of where these forecasts come from and who scrutinises their viability? Do they follow criteria set by the SFC? Why are not all the colleges doing what Ayrshire College and Glasgow Kelvin College have done?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Well, I am.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Ayrshire College is the only one that still carries a PFI burden, as I understand it. That has had a substantial impact on the college over many years. Thank you very much for answering those questions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much. David Weston has his hand up.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
The panel covered one question that I was going to raise, which was about making clear how the money is spent and how it benefits the local community. You have made it perfectly clear that you would like to see that strengthened in the bill so that it can be demonstrated to the public that the revenues gained were for the purpose intended. Thank you very much for that.
I mentioned to the previous panel that the broad principle and policy aim of the bill is to develop, support and sustain facilities or services that are substantially used by persons visiting the scheme area for leisure purposes. In your view, is that the correct approach? That kind of assumes that we include business travellers in that. Is that the correct approach? I am just looking for a simple response on that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thanks very much, everybody, for those responses. Back to you, convener.