The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2341 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Yes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Does anyone else have an idea of what the percentage occupation is?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Willie Coffey
That is very helpful. I have a follow-up question. I am curious as to whether we have any figures on the average percentage of time for which a second home is occupied per year. Council colleagues may have a figure for that. If you live in your house, I imagine that that would generally count as 100 per cent occupation. What would that figure be for a second home?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Willie Coffey
What an important discussion we are having. It is important for the committee to hear Anne Rowan speak in the way that she has done. That is one of the most moving contributions that I have heard in my long experience as an MSP, so thanks for that.
I note that, while the committee has been in discussion, the Government has announced an extra £1 million for the community link worker health and social care partnership in Glasgow. Christiana Melam will probably be delighted to hear that wee bit of good news, and there will no doubt be a clamour from other health boards to get something similar.
My question is, how can we improve these services? I am thinking in particular about the Auditor General’s comments about the cluttered landscape and structures that we have. We have integration joint boards and health and social care partnerships, but we often do not have compatible systems to share information and so on.
Does anyone have a view on that? I would be obliged if you would give us a few thoughts on how we might improve the situation.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you for your important contributions.
This is my final question, in the interests of time. The Auditor General’s report was fairly critical of the Government’s ability to measure performance, quality of mental health outcomes and so on. However, everyone around the table has contributed some great ideas and great local experiences of good practice here, there and everywhere.
What are your views on how the Government can better do that so that we can report on outcomes? That is important. Should we collect the various experiences from around Scotland and somehow gather them together? I would appreciate your views on how we should tackle that. I start with you again, Dr Williams.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Mirren, do you want to come in on that question?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Willie Coffey
You have probably also heard some conversation about the financial memorandum and the business and regulatory impact assessment and whether they are still appropriate or whether they need to be updated and revised because they were prepared some years ago. Do you have a view on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Do you have any view on that, Mirren? [Interruption.] You were mute there, but I think that you said no.
I have a final query for Councillor Macgregor. We have been talking about flexibility throughout this discussion and debate. Some folk say that it is localism for localism’s sake, but other folk say that it is very important that local authorities have the powers and the flexibility to do things that best suit local circumstances. What does COSLA think about the application of flexibility? Should there be rigid rules and guidance, or should there be as much localism as we can possibly put into the system?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Is there a risk of confusing visitors with local versions of the scheme? They would go around Scotland and find different systems in different places, and the levy would be different. Some places might have a flat rate and some places might have a percentage rate.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Willie Coffey
Some businesses have said that they might have to reduce the number of bed nights available so that they do not cross the threshold, which sounds as if it runs counter to the aims of the policy. You say that it is down to local authorities to try to manage that but, frankly, I cannot see how they can avoid the issue. VAT is paid on the levy, and that is chargeable and so on.